Abstract

The size dependency of maximum growth rates was investigated in cyanobacteria and in green algae (Chlorophyta). Both unicellular and colony-forming species were included in the study. Significant allometric relationships were found between size and maximum growth rate for both cyanobacteria and green algae. The size-dependent growth could be described by the same scaling exponent in both cyanobacteria and green algae, but in both cyanobacteria and green algae only unicells evinced size-dependent growth rates—there was no relationship between colony size and growth rate in colonial forms of cyanobacteria and green algae. It is concluded that the colonial growth form represents an evolutionary adaptation to escape the negative effects of size-dependent growth, while retaining the positive effects of increased size, e.g. a decreased grazing pressure.

Received September 8, 2005; accepted in principle January 12, 2006; accepted for publication February 2, 2006; published online February 3, 2006
 Communicating editor: K.J. Flynn

INTRODUCTION

Strong scaling relationships have often been shown between metabolic rates or growth on one side and size on the other. They can be described by an allometric power function:
\[\mathrm{Rate\ }=\mathrm{\ }aW^{b}\]
where Rate can be any metabolic rate or the growth rate and W is the size or body mass of the organism. If the rate is a specific metabolic rate or the specific growth rate, then the exponent b is usually found to be −0.33 or −0.25 (Peters, 1983; Geider et al., 1986). The phenomenon has probably been most thoroughly studied in animals (Peters, 1983), but has been documented for photosynthetic organisms from unicellular algae to trees as well (Niklas, 1994; Nielsen et al., 1996).

It has been found that different types of animals (unicells, poikilotherms and homeotherms) display scaling relationships with the same slope and thus with basically the same dependence of size on metabolism, but with some offset of the line, corresponding to varying metabolic costs for different types of animals with the same size (lowest for unicells, highest for homeotherms) (Hemmingsen, 1960). Research on allometric scaling in photosynthetic organisms has focused on documenting scaling relationships, covering a broad range of photosynthetic organisms from unicellular algae to trees and cacti with very thick photosynthetic tissue (Enríquez et al., 1996; Nielsen et al., 1996). Any systematic differences between unicellular algae, colony-forming algae and multicellular algae and plants have not so far received sufficient attention.

Earlier studies of allometric scaling relationships on specific taxonomic groups of algae led to the conclusion that different taxonomic groups displayed different scaling relationships and that some groups displayed very weak relationships or none at all (Banse, 1976, 1982b; Blasco et al., 1982; Geider et al., 1986; Chisholm, 1992). Similarly, different scaling relationships have been shown for prokaryotic photosynthetic organisms (cyanobacteria) and eukaryotic photosynthetic organisms (Shuter, 1978; Niklas, 1994). This have led to the statement that scaling exponents in photosynthetic organisms evince phyletic dependence (Niklas, 1994).

The exact nature of the scaling relationships has also been debated. A scaling exponent of −0.33 is predicted if size-dependent growth and metabolism are controlled by the relationship between surface, through which exchange of energy and matter with the surroundings take place, and volume in which all metabolic processes take place (Brown et al., 2000). This has long been known and is often referred to as the surface-law (Sarrus and Rameaux, 1839; Rubner, 1883). It has been argued that the scaling exponents that are actually found are closer to −0.25, referred to as Kleibers rule (Kleiber, 1932; Brown et al., 2000) and a mechanistic model for the −0.25 scaling exponent based on first principles has been proposed (West et al., 1997). It has, however, recently been shown that the scaling of the basal metabolic rate in animals follows the surface law rather than Kleibers rule (White and Seymour, 2003). Organisms change form while increasing in size. Small organisms are nearly spherical, but if large organisms also were spherical, they would have very long diffusion pathways from the surface of the organisms. It has therefore been argued that morphological isometry is not beneficial for the passive diffusion of substances (Niklas, 1994). Probably due to an evolutionary response to these constraints organisms become flatter with increasing size (Niklas, 1994) or have developed other anatomical and morphological adaptations (West and Brown, 2005). The first response is seen in photosynthetic organisms in flat thalli and flat leaves in macroalgae and higher plants, and the second response is seen in mass flow transport systems (lungs, blood etc.) in animals.

In this study changes in allometric scaling relationships with increasing organism size and complexity will be considered, and the question of phyletic dependence and the nature of the scaling exponent addressed, based on data on green algae (Chlorophyta) and cyanobacteria. Although it has previously been shown that the same scaling exponent can be used to describe size-dependent growth over a range of photosynthetic organisms from microalgae to trees (Nielsen and Sand-Jensen, 1990; Nielsen et al., 1996), it has been argued, as mentioned above, that the scaling exponent of different algae groups vary depending on their phyletic affiliation (Niklas, 1994). Green algae and cyanobacteria were chosen for this study because especially the green algae, but also the cyanobacteria, show a large variety in size over 3 orders of magnitude (from <1 µm to ∼1 mm) and a variety in complexity with both unicellular and colony-forming species. Using these two groups of organisms allows effects of size and complexity to be tested without confounding effects of phyletic affiliation.

METHOD

The majority of data for this analysis were drawn from the literature. A total of 407 data points covering the species listed in Appendix 1 were drawn from the sources listed in Appendix 2. A minor portion of these data points (164 data points) were used in previous work on broad-range allometric scaling in photosynthetic organisms (Enríquez et al., 1996; Nielsen et al., 1996), but as those papers had a different focus, the data has not previously been used to elucidate the questions put forward here. The literature data have not been recalculated, but in some cases, where exact numbers were not given in text or tables, they have been acquired by digitizing figures in the papers. In a number of cases where only growth rates were given, they have been supplemented and paired with data on cell or colony size, drawn from the taxonomic literature (Tikkanen and Wilén, 1992).

To supplement the literature data, a total of 19 species of green algae (Chlorophyta) and nine species of cyanobacteria were grown in the laboratory as part of this work. These species comprised unicells as well as colony-forming species. All species were drawn from the Culture Collection of Algae at the University of Texas at Austin (UTEX) (Starr and Zeikus, 1993). The cultures were grown under conditions aimed at achieving optimal growth so that the measured growth rates would depend on intrinsic properties of the species and on internal cell processes rather than on external limiting factors. The cultures were grown axenically at 17°C in continuous light at a photon flux density of 200 µmol m−2 s−1. The light sources used were fluorescent tubes (Philips TLD Aquarelle and Philips TLD 90 Warm White). The algae were grown in round-bottomed flasks and were kept in suspension by bubbling with atmospheric air that had been passed through 0.3 µm glass microfiber filters (Whatman Hepa-Vent) to keep the cultures axenic. The growth media used were those used for each species at UTEX (Starr and Zeikus, 1993) so that several different media were used in the experiment. Please see Starr and Zeikus (Starr and Zeikus, 1993) for details or refer to the UTEX homepage (http://www.bio.utexas.edu/research/utex/). To ensure that nutrients were not exhausted and to keep the cultures in the exponential growth phase at low cell densities the media were frequently replenished. The intervals depended on the growth rate of the culture in question.

Growth rates were obtained by repeated counting of cells and colonies under the microscope using appropriate magnification and counting chambers. Only cultures found to be in the exponential growth phase were included in the data. Cell or colony density was counted with 1–5 days intervals, depending on the growth rate of the particular species. Several culture batches were run for each species and the data used in this context as maximal growth rates are the highest growth rates found. The size of cells and colonies were obtained by measuring under the microscope using an eyepiece with a calibrated micrometer. Sizes were measured during the counting of cells and colonies, and at least 100 cells or colonies were measured at each instance. Values given for sizes are the average values found during the growth experiment that yielded the maximum growth rate for that species. The appropriate measurement of size for the purpose of this study was assumed to be the thickness or minor axis of cells or colonies as this has previously been shown to be a good determinant of maximum growth rate (Nielsen et al., 1996).

The relationships between cell or colony size and maximum growth rate were described using least-squares regression analysis on log-transformed (base 10) variables. Logarithmic transformation of both variables was performed in order to transform the allometric power function Y = aXb to a straight line (

\(\mathrm{log}Y=\mathrm{log}a+b\mathrm{log}X\)
⁠). Differences in the scaling of growth rate to size among various subsets of data were examined using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) (Sokal and Rohlf, 1995), and differences between the calculated regression coefficients (values of b) and theoretical values were tested using Student’s t-test (Sokal and Rohlf, 1995).

RESULTS

Statistically significant relationships between cell or colony size and maximum growth rate are found for both green algae (Chlorophyta) and cyanobacteria (Fig. 1). The existence of very small colonial forms is a consequence of size being measured as thickness because the filaments of many filamentous algae are only one cell thick. The slopes and elevations of the lines found for green algae (b = −0.219, a = −0.103, Fig. 1, Table I) and for cyanobacteria (b = −0.202, a = −0.127, Fig. 1, Table I) are not significantly different when tested by analysis of covariance (P > 0.05), so eukaryotic green algae and prokaryotic cyanobacteria apparently follow the same allometric relationship between size and maximum growth rate. The slopes of −0.219 and −0.202, respectively, are not in accordance with the so-called surface-law as these values are significantly different from the value of −0.33 predicted by the surface-law (t-test, P < 0.001). They are, however, not significantly different from a value of −0.25 predicted from Kleibers rule (P > 0.05). When the datasets are broken down into subsets containing unicellular forms and colony-forming forms respectively (Fig. 1, Table I), it becomes clear that the relationship between size and growth rate is defined by strong relationships between cell size and growth rate in the unicellular forms. Both unicellular green algae and unicellular cyanobacteria show significant relationships between cell size and maximum growth rate with steeper slopes (–0.364 and −0.258, respectively, Fig. 1, Table I) than was found when colonial forms were included in the comparisons. Again, there is no significant difference between the two groups with regard to slope and elevation of the regression lines as analysed with analysis of covariance (P > 0.05), but in contrast to the situation with the total data sets, the unicells are in accordance with both the surface-law and Kleibers rule, as the slopes are not significantly different from either −0.25 or −0.33. The relationship between cell size and maximum growth rate is somewhat weaker for unicellular cyanobacteria than for unicellular green algae (r2 = 0.067 and 0.144, respectively), due to the wide range of growth rates reported as maximum growth rates for picoplanktonic cyanobacteria (Fig. 1). When only colony-forming forms are considered, no relationships between colony size and maximum growth rate for either green algae or cyanobacteria are found (Fig. 1, Table I). The slopes of −0.082 and −0.035 for green algae and cyanobacteria respectively (Table I) are not significantly different from zero (P = 0.289 and P = 0.537).

Fig. 1.

Relationships between maximum growth rates and cell or colony size measured as thickness/length of the minor axis for green algae and cyanobacteria. The relationships for the total data sets for each taxonomic group are shown as well as for data subsets of unicells and colonies for each group. The lines are the fitted least-squares regressions lines (Table I).

Table I:

Slope, constant and regression statistics for the least-squares regressions lines in Fig. 1

Algal groupSlopeConstantnr2P
Green algae, total data set−0.219 ± 0.086−0.103 ± 0.1002110.107<<0.0001
Cyanobacteria, total data set−0.202 ± 0.061−0.127 ± 0.0413360.114<<0.0001
Unicellular green algae−0.364 ± 0.1650.004 ± 0.1331140.144<<0.0001
Unicellular cyanobacteria−0.258 ± 0.137−0.105 ± 0.0451890.067<<0.0001
Colonial green algae−0.082 ± 0.151−0.273 ± 0.227970.0130.289
Colonial cyanobacteria−0.035 ± 0.112−0.293 ± 0.1061470.0030.537
Algal groupSlopeConstantnr2P
Green algae, total data set−0.219 ± 0.086−0.103 ± 0.1002110.107<<0.0001
Cyanobacteria, total data set−0.202 ± 0.061−0.127 ± 0.0413360.114<<0.0001
Unicellular green algae−0.364 ± 0.1650.004 ± 0.1331140.144<<0.0001
Unicellular cyanobacteria−0.258 ± 0.137−0.105 ± 0.0451890.067<<0.0001
Colonial green algae−0.082 ± 0.151−0.273 ± 0.227970.0130.289
Colonial cyanobacteria−0.035 ± 0.112−0.293 ± 0.1061470.0030.537

All regressions are on double logarithmically transformed data, so the line is:

\(\mathrm{log}_{10}Y=a+b\mathrm{log}_{10}X\)
. The slope and the constant are given ± standard error.

Table I:

Slope, constant and regression statistics for the least-squares regressions lines in Fig. 1

Algal groupSlopeConstantnr2P
Green algae, total data set−0.219 ± 0.086−0.103 ± 0.1002110.107<<0.0001
Cyanobacteria, total data set−0.202 ± 0.061−0.127 ± 0.0413360.114<<0.0001
Unicellular green algae−0.364 ± 0.1650.004 ± 0.1331140.144<<0.0001
Unicellular cyanobacteria−0.258 ± 0.137−0.105 ± 0.0451890.067<<0.0001
Colonial green algae−0.082 ± 0.151−0.273 ± 0.227970.0130.289
Colonial cyanobacteria−0.035 ± 0.112−0.293 ± 0.1061470.0030.537
Algal groupSlopeConstantnr2P
Green algae, total data set−0.219 ± 0.086−0.103 ± 0.1002110.107<<0.0001
Cyanobacteria, total data set−0.202 ± 0.061−0.127 ± 0.0413360.114<<0.0001
Unicellular green algae−0.364 ± 0.1650.004 ± 0.1331140.144<<0.0001
Unicellular cyanobacteria−0.258 ± 0.137−0.105 ± 0.0451890.067<<0.0001
Colonial green algae−0.082 ± 0.151−0.273 ± 0.227970.0130.289
Colonial cyanobacteria−0.035 ± 0.112−0.293 ± 0.1061470.0030.537

All regressions are on double logarithmically transformed data, so the line is:

\(\mathrm{log}_{10}Y=a+b\mathrm{log}_{10}X\)
. The slope and the constant are given ± standard error.

DISCUSSION

The data for green algae and cyanobacteria that are analysed in this study clearly show that eukaryotic green algae and prokaryotic cyanobacteria follow the same allometric relationship. This is in good agreement with previous work by this author and co-workers, who found that one scaling exponent can describe size-dependent growth over the whole range of photosynthetic organisms from unicellular algae over macroalgae and submerged angiosperms to terrestrial plants including trees and cacti (Nielsen and Sand-Jensen, 1990; Nielsen et al., 1996), but disagrees with some of the earlier reviews of size-dependent growth in phytoplankton, dealing mainly with diatoms and dinoflagellates, that find different scaling exponents in different taxonomic groups (Banse, 1976, 1982a; Geider et al., 1986). Differences in the scaling of size-dependent growth rates among various taxonomic groups of algae can have profound ecological consequences and merit further studies. Although there is no evidence for phyletic dependence (Niklas, 1994) when comparing green algae and cyanobacteria in this study, it is clear from Fig. 1 that picophytoplankton can achieve highly variable maximum growth rates within a very limited size range. It has previously been suggested that picophytoplankton may deviate from the general allometric relationships (Raven, 1994), because a large fraction of their biomass is occupied by non-scalable components such as the genome, the plasmalemma and other membranes. Therefore a smaller fraction of the biomass is allocatable to core metabolic processes, determining the scaling exponents (Raven, 1998, 1999). In this study, no size-dependent growth is found within this group alone, but when compared with other cyanobacteria they, as a group, abide by the same allometric laws.

When comparing unicells alone, it becomes clear that unicells show a stronger relationship for size-dependent growth than when both unicells and colonial forms are included in the study. Again, there is no evidence of phyletic dependence when comparing green algae and cyanobacteria. The reason that unicells alone show a stronger allometric relationship between size and growth rate than is shown by the total data sets becomes clear when data for colonial forms alone are analysed: There is absolutely no relationship between size and maximum growth rate in either colonial green algae or colonial cyanobacteria. This is in accordance with the hypothesis (Niklas, 2000) that the colonial growth form represents an evolutionary solution to the problem that is inherent in size-dependent growth: that the growth rate decreases with increasing size. By being colonial these species can escape the constraints of size-dependent growth and achieve higher growth rates than would be possible for unicells of a similar size. They do this by becoming flatter in the sense that shape is measured as (surface area)3 × (volume)−2 (Niklas, 1994): many colonial cyanobacteria and some colonial green algae are filamentous and as such they can increase their size without increasing the diffusional pathway from their surface to the cell interior simply by becoming longer. Other colonial algae form colonies more or less shaped as flat discs or plates still only one or a few cell layers thick, and even the largest colonial green algae among the Volvocales form colonies that are hollow spheres. Although they may be several hundred µm in diameter, they still are only one cell layer thick. Interestingly, some very large unicellular diatoms, such as Ethmodiscus, whose cell volume is dominated by the vacuole, are also able to achieve growth rates that are higher than would be predicted from their size. In this respect, they can be seen as analogues to the hollow-sphere growth form (Villareal et al., 1999).

The efficiency of supply of various substances by diffusion from the cell surface as well as the capacity for light interception for various geometric shapes decrease in the order plate > cylinder > disk > sphere (Niklas and Kerchner, 1984; Niklas, 1994, 2000). It is therefore advantageous for larger photosynthetic organisms to be as flat or oblong as possible to avoid diffusional limitation at low nutrient concentrations, and the colonial life form probably gives the organisms larger flexibility regarding possible geometric shapes. Very small unicellular organisms are close to being spherical (Niklas, 2000), and although unicellular forms too become flatter with increasing size (Niklas, 2000), the fact that they consist of only one cell probably constrains not only achievable size, but also possible geometric form. Colonial algae can thus take advantage of the positive aspects of size, e.g. lower grazing pressure (Cyr and Pace, 1993), without paying the full cost of decreased metabolism and reduced growth (Niklas and Kerchner, 1984; Niklas, 1994, 2000) that is predicted from the size-dependent growth (Nielsen and Sand-Jensen, 1990; Enríquez et al., 1996; Nielsen et al., 1996). The colonial growth form enables exchange of metabolites among neighbours (Niklas, 2000) and it is also entirely possible that some of the colonial forms have division of labor among the cells. This has been shown to be the case in the Volvocales (Kirk, 1998), where division of labor occurs above a threshold of about 64 cells (Bell, 1985). Division of labor will give colonial forms advantages over unicells in addition to those brought about by size itself.

The data do not allow any firm conclusions as to the schism between the surface law and the Kleibers rule. The scaling exponent found for unicells are in accordance with both ‘laws’, but when the total datasets are considered, only Kleibers rule describes the data sufficiently. This may, however, be regarded as an artifact due to the inclusion of the colony-forming algae, that do not follow any allometric relationships between size and maximum growth rates.

APPENDIX 1

List of species of which data are included in this study.

Cyanobacteria
Anabaena sp.Oscillatoria bourrellyi
Anabaena affinisOscillatoria limnetica
Anabaena circinalisOscillatoria redekei
Anabaena flos-aquaOscillatoria tenuis
Anabaena oscillatoidesPhormidium sp.
Anabaena solitariaPhormidium autumnale
Anabaena spiroidesPhormidium mucicola
Anabaena variabilisPhormidium tenue
Anacystis sp.Pinnularia borealis
Aphanizomenon flos-aquaePlanktosphaerella terrestris
Gloeobacter violaceaPlanktothrix agardhii
Gloeotrica echinulataPlanktothrix rubescens
Limnotrix redekeiProchlorococcus sp.
Merismopedia tenuissimaPseudoanabaena catenata
Microcoleus chtonoplastesSchizothrix calcicola
Microcystis aeriginosaSpirulina maxima
Microcystis reinboldiiSymploca sp.
Microcystis viridisSynechococcus sp.
Microcystis wesenbergiiSynechococcus leopolensis
Nodularia sp.Synechococcus linearis
Oscillatoria sp.Synechocystis sp.
Oscillatoria agardhiiZygnema sp.
Green algae (Chlorophyta)
Ankyra sp.Friedmannia sp.
Asterococcus superbusGonium sociale
Chlamydomonas sp.Heteromastix pyriformis
Chlamydomonas brannoniiHydrodictyon africanum
Chlamydomonas cribumLagerheimia subsalsa
Chlamydomonas frankiiMicromonas pusilla
Chlamydomonas giganteaMonoraphidium concortum
Chlamydomonas gymnogamaNannochloris bacillaris
Chlamydomonas moewsiiNannochlorum eucarotum
Chlamydomonas noctigamaOocystis pusilla
Chlamydomonas pulsatillaPediastrum angulosum
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiPediastrum biradiatum
Chlamydomonas subglobosaPediastrum boryanum
Chlorella sp.Pediastrum duplex
Chlorella marinaPediastrum tetras
Chlorella nanaPleodorina californica
Chlorella ovalisPrototheca zopfii
Chlorella pyrenoidosaScenedesmus abundans
Chlorella salinaScenedesmus acuminatus
Chlorella spaerchkiiScenedesmus armatus
Chlorella vulgarisScenedesmus obliquus
Chlorogonium elongatumScenedesmus quadricauda
Choricystis coccoidesSelenastrum bibraianum
Closterium acculareSelenastrum capricornutum
Coelastrum microporumSphaerellopsis aulata
Cosmarium botrytisSphaeocystis sp.
Cosmarium depressumSphaerocystis achroeterii
Dunaliella sp.Staurastrum luetkemuelleri
Dunaliella primolectaStaurastrum pingue
Dunaliella salinaStichococcus sp.
Dunaliella tertiolectaTetraedon bitridens
Eudorina elegansTetraedon minimum
Eudorina unicoccusVolvox aureus
Cyanobacteria
Anabaena sp.Oscillatoria bourrellyi
Anabaena affinisOscillatoria limnetica
Anabaena circinalisOscillatoria redekei
Anabaena flos-aquaOscillatoria tenuis
Anabaena oscillatoidesPhormidium sp.
Anabaena solitariaPhormidium autumnale
Anabaena spiroidesPhormidium mucicola
Anabaena variabilisPhormidium tenue
Anacystis sp.Pinnularia borealis
Aphanizomenon flos-aquaePlanktosphaerella terrestris
Gloeobacter violaceaPlanktothrix agardhii
Gloeotrica echinulataPlanktothrix rubescens
Limnotrix redekeiProchlorococcus sp.
Merismopedia tenuissimaPseudoanabaena catenata
Microcoleus chtonoplastesSchizothrix calcicola
Microcystis aeriginosaSpirulina maxima
Microcystis reinboldiiSymploca sp.
Microcystis viridisSynechococcus sp.
Microcystis wesenbergiiSynechococcus leopolensis
Nodularia sp.Synechococcus linearis
Oscillatoria sp.Synechocystis sp.
Oscillatoria agardhiiZygnema sp.
Green algae (Chlorophyta)
Ankyra sp.Friedmannia sp.
Asterococcus superbusGonium sociale
Chlamydomonas sp.Heteromastix pyriformis
Chlamydomonas brannoniiHydrodictyon africanum
Chlamydomonas cribumLagerheimia subsalsa
Chlamydomonas frankiiMicromonas pusilla
Chlamydomonas giganteaMonoraphidium concortum
Chlamydomonas gymnogamaNannochloris bacillaris
Chlamydomonas moewsiiNannochlorum eucarotum
Chlamydomonas noctigamaOocystis pusilla
Chlamydomonas pulsatillaPediastrum angulosum
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiPediastrum biradiatum
Chlamydomonas subglobosaPediastrum boryanum
Chlorella sp.Pediastrum duplex
Chlorella marinaPediastrum tetras
Chlorella nanaPleodorina californica
Chlorella ovalisPrototheca zopfii
Chlorella pyrenoidosaScenedesmus abundans
Chlorella salinaScenedesmus acuminatus
Chlorella spaerchkiiScenedesmus armatus
Chlorella vulgarisScenedesmus obliquus
Chlorogonium elongatumScenedesmus quadricauda
Choricystis coccoidesSelenastrum bibraianum
Closterium acculareSelenastrum capricornutum
Coelastrum microporumSphaerellopsis aulata
Cosmarium botrytisSphaeocystis sp.
Cosmarium depressumSphaerocystis achroeterii
Dunaliella sp.Staurastrum luetkemuelleri
Dunaliella primolectaStaurastrum pingue
Dunaliella salinaStichococcus sp.
Dunaliella tertiolectaTetraedon bitridens
Eudorina elegansTetraedon minimum
Eudorina unicoccusVolvox aureus

List of species of which data are included in this study.

Cyanobacteria
Anabaena sp.Oscillatoria bourrellyi
Anabaena affinisOscillatoria limnetica
Anabaena circinalisOscillatoria redekei
Anabaena flos-aquaOscillatoria tenuis
Anabaena oscillatoidesPhormidium sp.
Anabaena solitariaPhormidium autumnale
Anabaena spiroidesPhormidium mucicola
Anabaena variabilisPhormidium tenue
Anacystis sp.Pinnularia borealis
Aphanizomenon flos-aquaePlanktosphaerella terrestris
Gloeobacter violaceaPlanktothrix agardhii
Gloeotrica echinulataPlanktothrix rubescens
Limnotrix redekeiProchlorococcus sp.
Merismopedia tenuissimaPseudoanabaena catenata
Microcoleus chtonoplastesSchizothrix calcicola
Microcystis aeriginosaSpirulina maxima
Microcystis reinboldiiSymploca sp.
Microcystis viridisSynechococcus sp.
Microcystis wesenbergiiSynechococcus leopolensis
Nodularia sp.Synechococcus linearis
Oscillatoria sp.Synechocystis sp.
Oscillatoria agardhiiZygnema sp.
Green algae (Chlorophyta)
Ankyra sp.Friedmannia sp.
Asterococcus superbusGonium sociale
Chlamydomonas sp.Heteromastix pyriformis
Chlamydomonas brannoniiHydrodictyon africanum
Chlamydomonas cribumLagerheimia subsalsa
Chlamydomonas frankiiMicromonas pusilla
Chlamydomonas giganteaMonoraphidium concortum
Chlamydomonas gymnogamaNannochloris bacillaris
Chlamydomonas moewsiiNannochlorum eucarotum
Chlamydomonas noctigamaOocystis pusilla
Chlamydomonas pulsatillaPediastrum angulosum
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiPediastrum biradiatum
Chlamydomonas subglobosaPediastrum boryanum
Chlorella sp.Pediastrum duplex
Chlorella marinaPediastrum tetras
Chlorella nanaPleodorina californica
Chlorella ovalisPrototheca zopfii
Chlorella pyrenoidosaScenedesmus abundans
Chlorella salinaScenedesmus acuminatus
Chlorella spaerchkiiScenedesmus armatus
Chlorella vulgarisScenedesmus obliquus
Chlorogonium elongatumScenedesmus quadricauda
Choricystis coccoidesSelenastrum bibraianum
Closterium acculareSelenastrum capricornutum
Coelastrum microporumSphaerellopsis aulata
Cosmarium botrytisSphaeocystis sp.
Cosmarium depressumSphaerocystis achroeterii
Dunaliella sp.Staurastrum luetkemuelleri
Dunaliella primolectaStaurastrum pingue
Dunaliella salinaStichococcus sp.
Dunaliella tertiolectaTetraedon bitridens
Eudorina elegansTetraedon minimum
Eudorina unicoccusVolvox aureus
Cyanobacteria
Anabaena sp.Oscillatoria bourrellyi
Anabaena affinisOscillatoria limnetica
Anabaena circinalisOscillatoria redekei
Anabaena flos-aquaOscillatoria tenuis
Anabaena oscillatoidesPhormidium sp.
Anabaena solitariaPhormidium autumnale
Anabaena spiroidesPhormidium mucicola
Anabaena variabilisPhormidium tenue
Anacystis sp.Pinnularia borealis
Aphanizomenon flos-aquaePlanktosphaerella terrestris
Gloeobacter violaceaPlanktothrix agardhii
Gloeotrica echinulataPlanktothrix rubescens
Limnotrix redekeiProchlorococcus sp.
Merismopedia tenuissimaPseudoanabaena catenata
Microcoleus chtonoplastesSchizothrix calcicola
Microcystis aeriginosaSpirulina maxima
Microcystis reinboldiiSymploca sp.
Microcystis viridisSynechococcus sp.
Microcystis wesenbergiiSynechococcus leopolensis
Nodularia sp.Synechococcus linearis
Oscillatoria sp.Synechocystis sp.
Oscillatoria agardhiiZygnema sp.
Green algae (Chlorophyta)
Ankyra sp.Friedmannia sp.
Asterococcus superbusGonium sociale
Chlamydomonas sp.Heteromastix pyriformis
Chlamydomonas brannoniiHydrodictyon africanum
Chlamydomonas cribumLagerheimia subsalsa
Chlamydomonas frankiiMicromonas pusilla
Chlamydomonas giganteaMonoraphidium concortum
Chlamydomonas gymnogamaNannochloris bacillaris
Chlamydomonas moewsiiNannochlorum eucarotum
Chlamydomonas noctigamaOocystis pusilla
Chlamydomonas pulsatillaPediastrum angulosum
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiPediastrum biradiatum
Chlamydomonas subglobosaPediastrum boryanum
Chlorella sp.Pediastrum duplex
Chlorella marinaPediastrum tetras
Chlorella nanaPleodorina californica
Chlorella ovalisPrototheca zopfii
Chlorella pyrenoidosaScenedesmus abundans
Chlorella salinaScenedesmus acuminatus
Chlorella spaerchkiiScenedesmus armatus
Chlorella vulgarisScenedesmus obliquus
Chlorogonium elongatumScenedesmus quadricauda
Choricystis coccoidesSelenastrum bibraianum
Closterium acculareSelenastrum capricornutum
Coelastrum microporumSphaerellopsis aulata
Cosmarium botrytisSphaeocystis sp.
Cosmarium depressumSphaerocystis achroeterii
Dunaliella sp.Staurastrum luetkemuelleri
Dunaliella primolectaStaurastrum pingue
Dunaliella salinaStichococcus sp.
Dunaliella tertiolectaTetraedon bitridens
Eudorina elegansTetraedon minimum
Eudorina unicoccusVolvox aureus

APPENDIX 2

Sources of data on growth rates and/or cell and colony size used in this paper.

Affronti, L. F. and Marshall, H. G. (1994) Using frequency of dividing cells in estimating autotrophic picoplankton growth and productivity in the Chesapeake Bay. Hydrobiologia,284, 193–203.

Agawin, N. S. R. and Agustí, S. (1997) Abundance, frequency of dividing cells and growth rates of Synechococcus sp. (cyanobacteria) in the stratified Northwest Mediterranean Sea. J. Plankton Res., 19, 1599–1615.

Agawin, N. S. R., Duarte, C. M., Agustí, S. et al. (2003) Abundance, biomass and growth rates of Synechococcus sp. in a tropical coastal ecosystem (Philippines, South China Sea). Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 56, 493–502.

Agustí, S. and Kalff, J. (1989) The influence of growth conditions on the size dependence of maximal algal density and biomass. Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 1104–1108.

André, J.-M., Navarette, C., Blanchot, J. et al. (1999) Picophytoplankton dynamics in the equatorial Pacific: growth and grazing rates from cytometric counts. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 3369–3380.

Baker, P. D., Brookes, J. D., Burch, M. D. et al. (2000) Advection, growth and nutrient status of phytoplankton populations in the lower river Murray, South Australia. Regul. Rivers Res. Manage.,16, 327–344.

Balode, M., Purina, I., Béchemin, C. et al. (1998) Effects of nutrient enrichment on the growth rates and community structure of summer phytoplankton from the Gulf of Riga, Baltic Sea. J. Plankton Res., 20, 2251–2272.

Boumnich, L., Derraz, M., Naji, B. et al. (2001) Influence des facteurs héliothermiques et nutritionnels sur la croissance et les capacités de stockage intracellulaire (azote et phosphore) chez Microcystis aeruginosa Kützing isolée de la retenue eutrophe El Kansera (Maroc). Ann. Limnol., 37, 191–198.

Bright, D. I. and Walsby, A. E. (2000) The daily integral of growth by Planktothrix rubescens calculated from growth rate in culture and irradiance in Lake Zürich. New Phytol., 146, 301–316.

Brown, C. M. and Trick, C. G. (1992) Response of the Cyanobacterium, Oscillatoria-Tenuis, to low iron environments—the effect on growth-rate and evidence for siderophore production. Arch. Microbiol., 157, 349–354.

Brown, S. L., Landry, M. R., Barber, R. T. et al. (1999) Picophytoplankton dynamics and production in the Arabian Sea during the 1995 Southwest Monsoon. Deep-Sea Res. II,46, 1745–1768.

Campbell, L. and Carpenter, E. J. (1986) Diel patterns of cell division in marine Synechococcus spp. (Cyanobacteria): use of the frequency of dividing cells technique to measure growth rate. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 32, 139–148.

Coles, J. F. and Jones, R. C. (2000) Effect of temperature on photosynthesis-light response and growth of four phytoplankton species isolated from a tidal freshwater river. J. Phycol., 36, 7–16.

Colman, J. A. and Santha, C. R. (1988) Critical concentrations of tissue nitrogen and phosphorus for growth rate and yield in the freshwater blue-green alga Microcystis aeriginosa Kütz. in the tropics. Aquat. Bot., 32, 167–177.

Davey, M. C., Davidson, H. P. B., Richard, K. J. et al. (1991) Attachment and growth of antarctic soil cyanobacteria and algae on natural and artificial substrata. Soil Biol. Biochem., 23, 185–191.

Davis, P. A., Dent, M., Parker, J. et al. (2003) The annual cycle of growth rate and biomass change in Planktothrix spp. in Blelham Tarn, English Lake District. Freshw. Biol., 48, 852–867.

Davis, P. A. and Walsby, A. E. (2002) Comparison of measured growth rates with those calculated from rates of photosynthesis in Planktothrix spp. isolated from Blelham Tarn, English Lake District. New Phytol., 156, 225–239.

De Nobel, W. T., Matthijs, H. C. P., Von Elert, E. et al. (1998) Comparison of the light-limited growth of the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria Anabaena and Aphanizomenon. New Phytol., 138, 579–587.

Eppley, R. W. and Sloan, P. R. (1966) Growth rates of marine phytoplankton: correlation with light absorption by cell chlorophyll a. Physiol. Plant., 19, 47–59.

Fahnenstiel, G. L., Patton, T. R., Carrick, H. J. et al. (1991) Diel division cycle and growth rates of Synechococcus in Lakes Huron and Michigan. Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol., 76, 657–664.

Faintuch, B. L., Sato, S. and Aquarone, E. (1991) Influence of the nutritional sources on the growth rate of cyanobacteria. Arq. Biol. Tecn., 34, 13–30.

Fujimoto, N., Inamori, Y., Sugiura, N. et al. (1994) Effects of temperature change on algal growth. Env. Tech.,15, 497–500.

Furnas, M. J. (1990) In situ growth rates of marine phytoplankton: approaches to measurement, community and species growth rates. J. Plankton Res., 12, 1117–1151.

Genoni, G. P., Behra, R., Montague, C. L. et al. (2001) Complex dynamics of adaptation in a nonaxenic Microcystis culture. 1. Effects of dinitrophenol on population growth. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.,48, 235–240.

Gerasimenko, L. M., Goncharova, I. V. and Zaitseva, L. V. (1998) Effect of phosphorus concentration on the growth and mineralization of cyanobacteria. Microbiology,67, 205–209.

Glover, H. E., Keller, M. D. and Spinrad, R. W. (1987) The effects of light quality and intensity on photosynthesis and growth of marine eukaryotic and prokaryotic phytoplankton clones. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 105, 137–159.

Goldman, J. C. and Graham, S. J. (1981) Inorganic carbon limitation and chemical composition of two freshwater green microalgae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 41, 60–70.

Goldman, J. C., McCarthy, J. J. and Peavey, D. G. (1979) Growth rate influence on the chemical composition of phytoplankton in oceanic waters. Nature,279, 210–215.

Grover, J. P. (1989) Phosphorus-dependent growth kinetics of 11 species of freshwater algae. Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 341–348.

Guanzon, N. G. and Nakahara, H. (2002) Growth and photosynthesis inhibition by agricultural pesticides in three freshwater microalgae. Fish. Sci., 68, 144–151.

Gupta, N., Bhaskar, A. S. B. and Rao, P. V. L. (2002) Growth characteristics and toxinproduction in batch cultures of Anabaena flos-aquae: effects of culture media and duration. World J. Microbiol. Biotech.,18, 29–35.

Hauschild, C. A., McMurter, H. J. G. and Pick, F. R. (1991) Effect of spectral quality on growth and pigmentation of picocyanobacteria. J. Phycol., 27, 698–702.

Henley, W. J. and Yin, Y. (1998) Growth and photosynthesis of marine Synechococcus (Cyanophyceae) under iron stress. J. Phycol., 34, 94–103.

Hesse, K., Dittman, E. and Boerner, T. (2001) Consequences of impaired microcystin production for light-dependent growth and pigmentation of Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7806. FEMS Microbiol Ecol., 37, 39–43.

Iturriaga, R. and Marra, J. (1988) Temporal and spatial variability of chroococcoid cyanobacteria Synechococcus spp. specific growth rates and their contribution to primary production in the Sargasso Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 44, 175–181.

Jacquet, S., Partensky, F., Lennon, J.-F. et al. (2001) Diel patterns of growth and division in marine picoplankton in culture. J. Phycol., 37, 357–369.

Kennedy, K. C. (1984) The influence of cell size and the colonial habit on phytoplankton growth and nutrient uptake kinetics: a critical evaluation using a phylogenetically related series of volvocene green algae. Thesis, Master of Science. University of Texas at Arlington.

Kumazawa, S., Yumura, S. and Yoshisuji, H. (2001) Photoautotrophic growth of a recently isolated N-2-fixing marine non-heterocystous filamentous cyanobacterium, Symploca sp (Cyanobacteria). J. Phycol., 37, 482–487.

Lee, D. Y. and Rhee, G. Y. (1999) Kinetics of growth and death in Anabaena flos-aquae (cyanobacteria) under light limitation and supersaturation. J. Phycol., 35, 700–709.

Levasseur, M., Thompson, P. A. and Harrison, P. J. (1993) Physiological acclimation of marine phytoplankton to different nitrogen sources. J. Phycol., 29, 587–595.

Litchman, E. (2000) Growth rates of phytoplankton under fluctuating light. Freshw. Biol., 44, 223–235.

Liu, H. B., Campbell, L. and Landry, M. R. (1995) Growth and mortality-rates of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus measured with a selective inhibitor technique. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 116, 277–287.

Long, B. M., Jones, G. J. and Orr, P. T. (2001) Cellular microcystin content in N-limited Microcystis aeruginosa can be predicted from growth rate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 67, 278–283.

Lukac, M. and Aegerter, R. (1993) Influence of trace metals on growth and toxin production of Microcystis aeriginosa. Toxicon,31, 293–305.

Mastala, Z., Herodek, S., V.-Balogh, K., Borbély, G., Shafik, H. M. and Vörös, L. (1996) Nutrient requirement and growth of a Synechococcus species isolated from Lake Balaton. Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol., 81, 503–512.

McAllister, C. D., Shah, N. and Strickland, J. D. H. (1964) Marine phytoplankton photosynthesis as a function of light intensity: a comparison of methods. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 21, 159–181.

McClausland, M. A., Thompson, P. A. and Blackburn, S. I. (2002) The effect of changes in light availability caused by mixing on the growth of Anabaena circinalis (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria) and Aulacoseira sp. (Centrales, Bacillariophyceae). Phycologia,41, 530–541.

Moal, J., Martin-Jezequel, V., Harris, R. P., Samain, J. F. and Poulet, S. A. (1987) Interspecific and intraspecific variability of the chemical composition of marine phytoplankton. Oceanol. Acta Paris,10, 339–346.

Moisander, P. and Paerl, H. W. (2000) Growth, primary productivity, and nitrogen fixation potential of Nodularia spp. (Cyanophyceae) in water from a subtropical estuary in the United States. J. Phycol., 36, 645–658.

Neuer, S. (1992) Growth dynamics of marine Synechococcus Spp in the Gulf of Alaska. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 83, 251–262.

Nicklisch, A. (1998) Growth and light absorption of some planktonic cyanobacteria, diatoms and Chlorophyceae under simulated light fluctuations. J. Plankton Res., 20, 105–119.

Nicklish, A. and Fietz, S. (2001) The influence of light fluctuations on growth and photosynthesis of Stephanodiscus neoastraea (diatom) and Planktothrix agardhii (cyanobacterium). Arch. Hydrobiol., 151, 141–156.

Oh, H.-M. and Rhee, G.-Y. (1991) A comparative study of microalgae isolated from flooted rice paddies: light-limited growth, C fixation, growth efficiency and relative N and P requirement. J. Appl. Phycol., 3, 211–220.

Ohkubo, N., Yagi, O. and Okada, M. (1993) Studies on the succession of blue-green algae, Microcystis, Anabaena, Oscillatoria and Phormidium in Lake Kasumigaura. Environ. Technol.,14, 433–442.

Ojala, A. (1993) The influence of light quality on growth and phycobiliprotein/chlorophyll a fluorescence quotients of some species of freshwater algae in culture. Phycologia,32, 22–28.

Orr, P. T. and Jones, G. I. (1998) Relationship between microcystin production and cell division rates in nitrogen-limited Microcystis aeruginosa cultures. Limnol. Oceanogr., 43, 1604–1614.

Owens, O. v. H. and Seliger, H. H. (1975) Effect of light intensity on dinoflagellate growth and photosynthesis. In Vernberg, F. J. (ed.), Physiological Adaptations to the Environment, Intext Educational Publishers, New York, USA, pp. 355–364.

Parsons, T. R., Stephens, K. and Strickland, J. D. H. (1961) On the chemical composition of eleven species of marine phytoplankters. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 18, 1001–1016.

Post, A. F., Loogman, J. G. and Mur, L. R. (1985) Regulation of growth and photosynthesis by Oscillatoria agardhii grown with a light/dark cycle. FEMS Microbiol Ecol., 31, 97–102.

Rao, P. V. L., Bhaskar, A. S. B. and Bhattacharya, R. (1996) Effects of nutrient media and culture duration on growth, macromolecular composition and toxicity in batch cultures of Microcystis aeruginosa. Microbios,86, 95–104.

Raven, J. A. (1986) Physiological consequences of extremely small size for autotrophic organisms in the sea. Can. Bull. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 214, 1–70.

Reynolds, C. S. (1984) The Ecology of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Robarts, R. D. and Zohary, T. (1987) Temperature effects on photosynthetic capacity, respiration, and growth rates of bloom-forming cyanobacteria. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res., 21, 391–399.

Sakshaug, E., Andresen, K., Myklestad, S. et al. (1983) Nutrient status of phytoplankton communities in Norwegian waters (marine, brackish, and fresh) as revealed by their chemical composition. J. Plankton Res., 5, 175–196.

Schlesinger, D. A., Molot, L. A. and Shuter, B. J. (1981) Specific growth rates of freshwater algae in relation to cell size and light intensity. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 38, 1052–1058.

Shalapyonok, A., Olson, R. J. and Shalapyonok, L. S. (1998) Ultradian growth in Prochlorococcus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64, 1066–1069.

Sherman, B. S., Webster, I. T., Jones, G. J. et al. (1998) Transitions between Aulacoseira and Anabaena dominance in a turbid river weir pool. Limnol. Oceanogr., 43, 1902–1915.

Sherry, N. D. and Wood, A. M. (2001) Phycoerythrin-containing picocyanobacteria in the Arabian Sea in February 1995: diel patterns, spatial variability, and growth rates. Deep-Sea Res. II, 48, 1263–1283.

Sosik, H. M. and Mitchell, B. G. (1994) Effects of temperature on growth, light-absorption, and quantum yield in Dunaliella-Tertiolecta (Chlorophyceae). J. Phycol., 30, 833–840.

Stockner, J. G., Rydin, E. and Hyenstrand, P. (2000) Cultural oligotrophication: causes and consequences for fisheries resources. Fisheries,25, 7–14.

Strathmann, R. R. (1967) Estimating the organic carbon content of phytoplankton from cell volume or plasma volume. Limnol. Oceanogr., 12, 411–418.

Sunda, W. G. and Huntsman, S. A. (1997) Interrelated influence of iron, light and cell size on marine phytoplankton growth. Nature,390, 389–392.

Tang, E. P. Y. and Vincent, W. F. (2000) Effects of daylength and temperature on the growth and photosynthesis of an Arctic cyanobacterium, Schizothrix calcicola (Oscillatoriaceae). Eur. J. Phycol., 35, 263–272.

Ward, A. K. and Wetzel, R. L. (1980) Interactions of light and nitrogen source among planktonic blue-green algae. Arch. Hydrobiol., 90, 1–25.

Watanabe, Y. (1987) The use of dialysis culture chamber to measure N/C and P/C ratios of individual phytoplankton species. Jpn. J. Limnol., 48, 137–140.

Welschmeyer, N. A. and Lorenzen, C. J. (1981) Chlorophyll-specific photosynthesis and quantum efficiency at subsaturating light intensities. J. Phycol., 17, 283–293.

Wyman, M. and Fay, P. (1986) Underwater light climate and the growth and pigmentation of planktonic blue-green algae (Cyanobacteria) I. The influence of light quantity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B,227, 367–380.

Zevenboom, W. and Mur, L. R. (1984) Growth and photosynthetic response of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa in relation to photoperiodicity and irradiance. Arch. Microbiol., 139, 232–239.

Zevenboom, W., Vaate, A. B. d. and Mur, L. R. (1982) Assessment of factors limiting growth rate of Oscillatoria agardhii in hypertrophic Lake Wolderwijd, 1978, by use of physiological indicators. Limnol. Oceanogr., 27, 39–52.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by grant no. 21000341 from the Danish Natural Science Research Council.

REFERENCES

Banse
,
K.
(
1976
) Rates of growth, respiration and photosynthesis of unicellular algae as related to cell size—a review.
J. Phycol.
,
12
,
135
–140.

Banse
,
K.
(
1982
) Cell volumes, maximal growth rates of unicellular algae and ciliates, and the role of ciliates in the marine pelagial.
Limnol. Oceanogr.
,
27
,
1059
–1071.

Banse
,
K.
(
1982
) Mass-scaled rates of respiration and intrinsic growth in very small invertebrates.
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.,
9
,
281
–297.

Bell
,
G.
(
1985
) The origin and early evolution of germ cells as illustrated by the Volvocales. In Halvorson, H. O. and Monroy, A. (eds),
The Origin and Evolution of Sex
. A.R. Liss, New York.

Blasco
,
D.
, Packard, T. T. and Garfield, P. C. (
1982
) Size dependence of growth rate, respiratory electron transport system activity, and chemical composition in marine diatoms in the laboratory.
J. Phycol.
,
18
,
58
–63.

Brown
,
J. H.
, West, G. B. and Enquist, B. J. (
2000
) Scaling in biology: patterns and processes, causes and consequences. In Brown, J. H. and West, G. B. (eds),
Scaling in Biology
. Oxford University Press, Oxford/ New York.

Chisholm
,
S. W.
(
1992
) Phytoplankton size. In Falkowski, P. G. and Woodhead, A. D. (eds),
Primary Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea
. Plenum Press, New York.

Cyr
,
H.
and Pace, M. L. (
1993
) Allometric theory: extrapolations from individuals to communities.
Ecology,
74
,
1234
–1245.

Enríquez
,
S.
, Duarte, C. M., Sand-Jensen, K et al. (
1996
) Broad-scale comparison of photosynthetic rates across phototrophic organisms.
Oecologia,
108
,
197
–206.

Geider
,
R. J.
, Platt, T. and Raven, J. A. (
1986
) Size dependence of growth and photosynthesis in diatoms: a synthesis.
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.,
30
,
93
–104.

Hemmingsen
,
A. M.
(
1960
) Energy metabolism as related to body size and respiratory surfaces, and its evolution.
Rep. Steno Mem. Hosp. Nord. Insulin Lab.
,
9
,
1
–110.

Kirk
,
D. L.
(
1998
)
Volvox. Molecular-Genetic Origins of Multicellularity and Cellular Differentiation
. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kleiber
,
M.
(
1932
) Body size and metabolism.
Hilgardia,
6
,
315
–353.

Nielsen
,
S. L.
, Enríquez, S., Duarte, C. M. et al. (
1996
) Scaling maximum growth rates across photosynthetic organisms.
Funct. Ecol.
,
10
,
167
–175.

Nielsen
,
S. L.
and Sand-Jensen, K. (
1990
) Allometric scaling of maximal photosynthetic growth rate to surface/volume ratio.
Limnol. Oceanogr.
,
35
,
177
–181.

Niklas
,
K. J.
(
1994
)
Plant Allometry. The Scaling of Form and Process.
The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Niklas
,
K. J.
(
2000
) The evolution of plant body plans—a biomechanical perspective.
Ann. Bot.
,
85
,
411
–438.

Niklas
,
K. J.
and Kerchner, V. (
1984
) Mechanical and photosynthetic constraints on the evolution of plant shape.
Paleobiology,
10
,
79
–101.

Peters
,
R. H.
(
1983
)
The Ecological Implications of Body Size
. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Raven
,
J. A.
(
1994
) Why are there no picoplanktonic O2 evolvers with volumes less than 10−19 m3?
J. Plankton Res.
,
16
,
565
–580.

Raven
,
J. A.
(
1998
) Small is beautiful: the picophytoplankton.
Funct. Ecol.
,
12
,
503
–513.

Raven
,
J. A.
(
1999
) Picophytoplankton.
Prog. Phycol. Res.
,
13
,
33
–106.

Rubner
,
M.
(
1883
) Über den Einfluss der Körpergrösse auf Stof und Kraftwechsel.
Z. Biologie,
19
,
535
–562.

Sarrus and Rameaux (

1839
) Mémoire adressé à l’Académie Royale.
Bulletin l’académie royale médicine,
3
,
1094
–1100.

Shuter
,
B. J.
(
1978
) Size dependence of phosphorus and nitrogen subsistence quotas in unicellular microorganisms.
Limnol. Oceanogr.
,
23
,
1248
–1255.

Sokal
,
R. R.
and Rohlf, F. J. (
1995
)
Biometry,
3rd ed. W.H. Freeman, New York.

Starr
,
R. C.
and Zeikus, J. A. (
1993
) UTEX—the culture collection of algae at the University of Texas at Austin.
J. Phycol.
,
29
Suppl.,
1
–106.

Tikkanen
,
T.
and Wilén, T. (
1992
)
Växtplanktonflora.
Naturvårdsverket, Solna.

Villareal
,
T. A.
, Joseph, L., Brzezinski, M. A. et al. (
1999
) Biological and chemical characteristics of the giant diatom Ethmodiscus (Bacillariophyceae) in the central North Pacific gyre.
J. Phycol.
,
35
,
896
–902.

West
,
G. B.
and Brown, J. H. (
2005
) The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization.
J. Exp. Biol.
,
208
,
1575
–1592.

West
,
G. B.
, Brown, J. H. and Enquist, B. J. (
1997
) A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology.
Science,
276
,
122
–126.

White
,
C. R.
and Seymour, R. S. (
2003
) Mammalian basal metabolic rate is proportional to body mass2/3.
PNAS,
100
,
4046
–4049.