Skip Navigation



JPR Advance Access published online on September 25, 2007

Journal of Plankton Research, doi:10.1093/plankt/fbm073
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/11/985    most recent
fbm073v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, C. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Normal versus Gamma: Stochastic models of copepod molting rate

Qiao Hu1,*, Colleen M. Petrik1 and Cabell S. Davis1

1 Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, U.S.A.

* Email: qhu{at}whoi.edu

Received on March 9, 2007; revised on July 10, 2007; accepted on September 22, 2007


   Abstract

Molting rate is a key life history parameter in copepods. Since copepod population growth is an inherently exponential process, accurate formulation of molting rate is of critical importance. Many experiments have been conducted to culture different copepod species under varying temperatures and food concentrations. Probability density functions (PDFs) then were used to estimate the median development time (MDT) of different copepod stages from the experimental data. These MDTs are used in copepod population models. Asymmetrical PDFs are widely used to model molting rate, because the shapes of these curves are similar to laboratory data on cohort development. In this paper, we developed an individual stochastic model (ISM) to simulate the molting rate with different PDFs. We showed that there was no connection between the asymmetry of cohorts and the asymmetry of the molting PDF. Although age-within-stage models have been widely used to simulate copepod population dynamics, we found that none had used the correct formulation of molting rate. The population model requires the probability of molting at each time step, whereas the laboratory-derived PDF is the frequency distribution of stage duration. Therefore, the PDF cannot be applied directly to the population model. We present here a corrected formula based on the PDF for use in copepod population models, termed the probability of molting for remaining individuals (PMR). Despite emphasis on use of the gamma function for copepod molting, we found simpler functions work equally well, but that prior use of incorrect molting rate functions in copepod models can seriously overestimate generation time.

Key Words: plankton • copepods • modeling • molting • normal • gamma


Communicating Editor: K.J. Flynn


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
D. Beyrend-Dur, S. Souissi, D. Devreker, G. Winkler, and J.-S. Hwang
Life cycle traits of two transatlantic populations of Eurytemora affinis (Copepoda: Calanoida): salinity effects
J. Plankton Res., July 1, 2009; 31(7): 713 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
W. C. Gentleman, A. B. Neuheimer, and R. G. Campbell
Modelling copepod development: current limitations and a new realistic approach
ICES J. Mar. Sci., April 1, 2008; 65(3): 399 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.