Skip Navigation



JPR Advance Access published online on June 29, 2006

Journal of Plankton Research, doi:10.1093/plankt/fbl021
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/9/857    most recent
fbl021v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joaquim-justo, C.
Right arrow Articles by Descy, J.-p.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Joaquim-justo, C.
Right arrow Articles by Descy, J.-p.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received November 10, 2005
Accepted June 20, 2006

Article

Trophic links in the lowland river Meuse (Belgium) : assessing the role of bacteria and protozoans in planktonic foodwebs

Célia Joaquim-justo 1 *, Samuel Pirlot 2, Laurent Viroux 2, Pierre Servais 3, Jean-pierre Thomé 1, and Jean-pierre Descy 2

1 Université de Liège - Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Ecotoxicology, Quai Van Beneden 22, B-4020 Liège, Belgium
2 Facultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix, URBO - Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology (LFE), rue de Bruxelles 61, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
3 Université Libre de Bruxelles - Ecology of Aquatic Systems, Campus de la Plaine, CP 221, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Célia Joaquim-justo, E-mail: Celia.Joaquim-Justo{at}ulg.ac.be


   Abstract

Trophic interactions within the plankton of the lowland river Meuse (Belgium) were measured in spring and summer 2001. Consumption of bacteria by protozoa was measured by monitoring the disappearance of 3H-thymidine labelled bacteria. Metazooplankton bacterivory was assessed using 0.5 µm fluorescent microparticles (FMPs) and predation of metazooplankton on ciliates was measured by using natural ciliate assemblages labelled with FMPs as tracer food. Grazing of metazooplankton on flagellates was determined through in situ incubations with manipulated metazooplankton densities. Protozooplankton bacterivory varied between 6.08 and 53.90 mg C m-3 d-1. i.e. from 0,12 to 0,86 gC-1 bacteria gC-1 protozoa d-1. Metazooplankton, essentially rotifers, grazing on bacteria was negligible compared to grazing by protozoa (~1000 times lower). Predation of rotifers on heterotrophic flagellates (HF) was generally low (on average 1.77 mg C m-3 d-1 i.e. 0,084 gC-1 flagellates gC-1 rotifers d-1), the higher contribution of HF in the diet of rotifers being observed when Keratella cochlearis was the dominant metazooplankter. Predation of rotifers on ciliates was low in spring samples (0.56 mg C m-3 d-1 i.e. 0,014 gC-1 ciliates gC-1 rotifers d-1) in contrast to measurements performed in July (8.72 mgC m-3 d-1 i.e. 0,242 gC-1 ciliates gC-1 rotifers d-1). The proportion of protozoa in the diet of rotifers was low compared to that of phytoplankton (< 30% of total carbon ingestion) except when phytoplankton biomass decreased below the incipient limiting level (ILL) of the main metazooplantonic species. In such conditions, protozoa (mainly ciliates) constituted ca. 50% of total rotifer diet. These results give evidence that microbial organisms play a significant role within the planktonic foodweb of a eutrophic lowland river, ciliates providing an alternative food for metazooplankton when phytoplankton becomes scarce.


Communicating Editor: KJ Flynn


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.