Skip Navigation



JPR Advance Access published online on February 2, 2006
Journal of Plankton Research, doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi126
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/297    most recent
fbi126v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marques, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Pardal, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marques, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Pardal, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received April 3, 2005
Accepted January 27, 2006

Article

Zooplankton and ichthyoplankton communities in a temperate estuary: spatial and temporal patterns

Sónia Cotrim Marques 1 *, Ulisses Miranda Azeiteiro 1, João Carlos Marques 1, João Miguel Neto 1, and Miguel Ângelo Pardal 1

1 IMAR - Institute of Marine Research, Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sónia Cotrim Marques, E-mail: scotrim{at}ci.uc.pt


  Abstract

Zooplankton and ichthyoplankton assemblages were studied from January 2003 to June 2004 in a temperate shallow estuary (Mondego estuary, Portugal). Monthly sampling was performed at 5 stations at high and low tide, with sub-surface tows with 335 and 500 µm mesh Bongo nets. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant effect (p<0.05) of the mesh size of the net on the abundance of main zooplankton groups. On average, the abundance of the 500 µm taxocenosis was 67 and 102 times lower than the 335 µm taxocenosis, at high and low tide respectively , especially in the south arm. More than 80 species were identified in the zooplankton samples. The upper reaches of northern arm are dominated by freshwater crustacean mesozooplankton like Acanthocyclops robustus and Diaptomus spp. and the cladocerans Daphnia , Ceriodaphnia and Bosmina, often being codominant. In the southern arm the resident estuarine copepod Acartia tonsa , was dominant, eventually being the most abundant taxon. Marine reaches of estuary are usually dominated by the marine calanoid copepods Acartia clausi and Temora longicornis and the siphonophores Muggiaea atlantica. Concerning the ichthyoplankton, this was dominated by the larvae of estuarine resident species, mainly Pomatoschistus sp., and eggs of Engraulis encrasicolus. The abundance of Pomatoschistus sp. larvae was positively correlated with water temperature. Statistical analysis (canonical correspondence analysis) used to determine the spatio-temporal structure of the zooplankton assemblages and its correlation with environmental variables showed that salinity and temperature were the main factors influencing the distribution of zooplankton. The results obtained also showed that abundance was strongly influenced by the hydrological circulation pattern and direct or indirect human impacts that occurs in each arm of the estuary.

Communicating Editor: RP Harris

This paper was presented at Plankton Symposium III, held at Figuera da Foz, Portugal between 17 and 20 March 2005, under the auspices of the University of Coimbra and the University of Aveiro, and coordinated by Mário Jorge Pereira and Ulisses M. Azeiteiro.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
S. C. Marques, U. M. Azeiteiro, F. Martinho, I. Viegas, and M. A. Pardal
Evaluation of estuarine mesozooplankton dynamics at a fine temporal scale: the role of seasonal, lunar and diel cycles
J. Plankton Res., October 1, 2009; 31(10): 1249 - 1263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.