Skip Navigation



JPR Advance Access published online on December 8, 2005

Journal of Plankton Research, doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi112
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/2/195    most recent
fbi112v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouvy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Troussellier, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bouvy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Troussellier, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received October 24, 2005
Accepted December 7, 2005

Article

Functional structure of microbial food-web in the Senegal River Estuary (West Africa): impact of metazooplankton

Marc Bouvy 1 *, Marc Pagano 2, Maimouna M’Boup 2, Patrice Got 3, and Marc Troussellier 3

1 Centre IRD Bel Air, UR 167 CYROCO, BP 1386, Dakar, Senegal; Laboratoire Ecosystèmes Lagunaires, UMR-CNRS 5119, Université Montpellier II, Case 093, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France
2 Centre IRD Bel Air, UR 167 CYROCO, BP 1386, Dakar, Senegal
3 Laboratoire Ecosystèmes Lagunaires, UMR-CNRS 5119, Université Montpellier II, Case 093, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Marc Bouvy, E-mail: bouvy{at}mpl.ird.fr


   Abstract

We studied the impact of various metazooplanktonic predators (two calanoid copepods and barnacle larvae) on microbial plankton isolated from the Senegal River Estuary. Experiments performed in microcosms were based on size-class fractionation (3, 12, 20 and 60 µm size-classes) of the microbial community in order to obtain different assemblages, including bacteria, heterotrophic nano-flagellates (HNF), ciliates, pico- and nanophytoplankton. Removal of bacterial predators larger than 3 µm increased the net growth rate of heterotrophic bacteria from 0.437 day-1 in the presence of all predators (fraction < 60 µm) to 0.682 day-1 (fraction < 3 µm). Removal of protozoa larger than 12 µm caused an increased net growth rate of flagellates from 0.102 day-1 (fraction < 60 µm) to 0.332 day-1 (fraction <12µm). The same results on protozoa dynamics were also observed in the presence of Temora stylifera (0.498 d -1) suggesting a trophic control of the protozoa larger than 12 µm by this copepod, allowing an increase in HNF growth rates through indirect effect. The highest ingestion rate over 60 h of experiment was recorded for the copepod Temora (61.1 µm3 ngC-1 h-1) and the lowest value for barnacle larvae (25.6 µm 3 ngC-1 h-1). An intermediate value (47.5 µm3 ngC-1 h-1) was recorded for the copepod Acartia clausi. All these ingestion rates were mainly channeled in the size-classes between < 3 and 15-18 µm ESD (6 and 2435 µm3, respectively), with the highest values noted between < 3 and 6-9 µm classes. In the presence of Temora , the cascading effects can explain both the decreases in mean volume and in growth rate for bacteria, due to the filtration of ciliates by the zooplanktonic predatorallowing the development of the HNF. The presence of a large size-class of bacteria (among the 5 classes identified by flow cytometry) and a high abundance of HNF suggest an efficient heterotrophic pathway within the microbial loop of this sub-saharan estuary.


Communicating Editor: IR Jenkinson


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.