Skip Navigation



JPR Advance Access published online on November 22, 2005

Journal of Plankton Research, doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi095
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/1/1    most recent
fbi095v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grover, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Chrzanowski, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Grover, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Chrzanowski, T. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received January 28, 2005
Accepted October 31, 2005

Article

Seasonal dynamics of phytoplankton in two warm temperate reservoirs: association of taxonomic composition with temperature

James P. Grover 1 * and Thomas H. Chrzanowski 1

1 Biology Department, Box 19498, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
James P. Grover, E-mail: grover{at}uta.edu


   Abstract

Variations in phytoplankton composition were observed over 2.7 years in two warm temperate reservoirs in north central Texas (USA), Joe Pool Lake and Eagle Mountain Lake, and analyzed in relation to temperature, light, dissolved nutrients, seston nutrient ratios, and hydrological variables. The dominant variations in both phytoplankton composition and environmental variables were seasonal and strongly related to the annual temperature cycle. Phytoplankton composition was annually periodic, with filamentous cyanobacteria, pennate diatoms and chlorophytes dominant in summer, while other chlorophytes, centric diatoms, cryptophytes, dinoflagellates and other flagellates either dominated in other seasons or remained abundant year round. The seasonal dynamics of several major taxa could be represented by a niche response model based on temperature alone, although seasonal variations in many environmental variables likely contributed to variation in phytoplankton composition. Such seasonal variations dominated these data, but interannual variation in phytoplankton composition and environmental variables also appeared to result from dry weather late in the study.


Communicating Editor: KJ Flynn
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. Cunliffe, A. S. Whiteley, L. Newbold, A. Oliver, H. Schafer, and J. C. Murrell
Comparison of Bacterioneuston and Bacterioplankton Dynamics during a Phytoplankton Bloom in a Fjord Mesocosm
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 15, 2009; 75(22): 7173 - 7181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
A. Nicklisch, T. Shatwell, and J. Kohler
Analysis and modelling of the interactive effects of temperature and light on phytoplankton growth and relevance for the spring bloom
J. Plankton Res., January 1, 2008; 30(1): 75 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.