Skip Navigation



JPR Advance Access published online on June 13, 2005
Journal of Plankton Research, doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi035
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/7/623    most recent
fbi035v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mair, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brierley, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mair, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brierley, A. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received March 18, 2005
Accepted May 26, 2005

Article

An investigation into the zooplankton composition of a prominent 38 kHz scattering layer in the North Sea

Angus M. Mair 1*, Paul G. Fernandes 1, Anne LeBourges-Dhaussy 2, and Andrew S. Brierley 3

1 FRS Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen, Scotland AB11 9DB
2 Centre IRD de Bretagne, BP 70, 29280 Plouzané, France
3 Gatty Marine Laboratory, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB, Scotland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Angus M. Mair, E-mail: a.mair{at}marlab.ac.uk


  Abstract

This study aims to determine the contribution made by zooplankton to acoustic scattering layers, which are particularly strong at 38 kHz, in the northern North Sea in summer. It uses a combination of net sampling and forward and inverse acoustic modelling of data collected at 38, 120 and 200 kHz in July 2003. Zooplankton samples were collected from regions of strong acoustic scattering in depths to approximately 50 m, using a U-tow vehicle. Acoustic data recorded simultaneously were scrutinised to determine actual backscattering, expressed as Mean Volume Backscattering Strength (MVBS) (dB). This observed MVBS (MVBSobs) was compared with backscattering predicted by application of appropriate acoustic models (MVBSpred) to sampled densities of zooplankton. In all instances, MVBSobs was greater than MVBSpred, with the difference considerably more pronounced at 38 kHz. There was a weak correlation between MVBSpred and MVBSobs at all three frequencies, with the greatest correlation (r=0.450, P = 0.545) at 120 kHz. A number of candidate acoustic models were inverted in order to infer the most likely type of scatterer. In most cases, scatterers with a gas inclusion were predicted by this method. Potential sources of inconsistencies between MVBSpred and MVBSobs were identified which, when considered alongside the presented forward and inverse solutions, indicate that 38 kHz scattering in particular must be due to sources other than sampled zooplankton.

Communicating Editor: KJ Flynn
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
M. Doray, P. Petitgas, L. Nelson, S. Mahevas, E. Josse, and L. Reynal
The influence of the environment on the variability of monthly tuna biomass around a moored, fish-aggregating device
ICES J. Mar. Sci., July 1, 2009; 66(6): 1410 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
P. G. Fernandes
Classification trees for species identification of fish-school echotraces
ICES J. Mar. Sci., July 1, 2009; 66(6): 1073 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.