Skip Navigation



JPR Advance Access published online on September 3, 2004

Journal of Plankton Research, doi:10.1093/plankt/fbh142
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/12/1559    most recent
fbh142v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirschner, A. K.T.
Right arrow Articles by Velimirov, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kirschner, A. K.T.
Right arrow Articles by Velimirov, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received June 11, 2004
Accepted August 23, 2004

Article

Variability and predictability of the empirical conversion factor for converting TDR-uptake into bacterial carbon production for a eutrophic lake

Alexander K.T. Kirschner 1*, Peter Wihlidal 1, and Branko Velimirov 1

1 Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Research Group General Microbiology; Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Strasse 10, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: alexander.kirschner{at}meduniwien.ac.at.


   Abstract

To assess the variability and predictability of the empirical conversion factor (CF) for converting the uptake of 3H-thymidine (TDR) to bacterial carbon production rates in eutrophic environments, 11 dilution culture experiments were performed and the results related to a set of important concomittantly recorded environmental variables. TdR incorporation data from a field study were then converted to carbon production with the established empirical CF, a theoretical CF and compared to production estimates derived from leucine incorporation. Mean empirical CF varied between 0.5 x 106 and 7.0 x 106 cells (pmol TDR)-1 over the year, and showed highly significant negative correlation with TDR incorporation rate and a highly significant positive correlation to temperature. Values of carbon production derived with the variable empirical CF were lower than the values obtained by the use of the theoretical CF of 1 x 106 cells (pmol TDR)-1. It showed less seasonal variation than values obtained by leucine incorporation and periods of uncoupling were observed. However, when the empirical CF was calculated from the multiple regression equation including TDR incorporation and temperature, the resulting carbon production rates showed a high correspondence with the leucine derived production rates. The results of the analyses were interpreted as an indication that under favourable conditions (resulting in high TDRincorporation) bacteria may be able to optimise DNA duplication over protein synthesis as a possible strategy to persist and to maintain their potential to divide under limiting conditions (e.g. decrease in temperature and substrate availability). At unfavourable conditions (resulting in low incorporation rates) bacteria may then use already produced DNA copies for rapid growth, when the environmental conditions turn favourable again. Thus, an experimental set-up causing nutrient enrichment of the sampled water by autoclaving and filtering, as generally used for dilution culture experiments, does not always reflect in-situ situations, especially during periods with low nutrient concentrations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
A. Calvo-Diaz and X. A. G. Moran
Empirical Leucine-to-Carbon Conversion Factors for Estimating Heterotrophic Bacterial Production: Seasonality and Predictability in a Temperate Coastal Ecosystem
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., May 15, 2009; 75(10): 3216 - 3221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.