Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on December 26, 2008
Journal of Plankton Research 2009 31(4):429-446; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbn127
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/4/429    most recent
fbn127v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pommier, J.
Right arrow Articles by Michel, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pommier, J.
Right arrow Articles by Michel, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Size-fractionated phytoplankton production and biomass during the decline of the northwest Atlantic spring bloom

Julien Pommier1,*, Michel Gosselin2 and Christine Michel3

1 Groupe de recherche sur les écosystèmes aquatiques (GREA), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351 boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada G9A 5H7 2 Institut des sciences de la mer de Rimouski (ISMER), Université du Québec à Rimouski, 310 allée des Ursulines, Rimouski, Québec, Canada G5L 3A1 3 Freshwater Institute, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 501 University Crescent, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N6

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: julien.pommier{at}uqtr.ca

Received on September 23, 2008; accepted on December 6, 2008


  Abstract

The size structure of phytoplankton production and biomass was surveyed during a 7-day Lagrangian study of the decline of the spring phytoplankton bloom in the northwest Atlantic and during post-bloom conditions. Well-stratified and nutrient-depleted surface waters led to nitrogen limitation of phytoplankton production and to the decline of one of the most productive blooms ever reported for the open North Atlantic Ocean. During the Lagrangian study period, large centric diatoms (≥5 µm) dominated both the phytoplankton production (≥50%) and chlorophyll a (chl a) biomass (≥82%) in the euphotic zone. During post-bloom conditions, small flagellates (0.7–5 µm) represented up to 79% of the total phytoplankton production and 45% of total chl a biomass. Throughout the study period, a deep chl a maximum (DCM), corresponding to a maximum in phytoplankton biomass and abundance, developed at the base of the euphotic zone, near the nutricline, where photo-acclimated cells maintained low sinking velocities. The analysis of the relative contribution of small and large phytoplankton cells to total primary production and biomass revealed that small phytoplankton were probably grazed by microzooplankton, whereas large cells accumulated in the euphotic zone at the DCM. The decline of the bloom was thus not associated with the rapid sinking of large phytoplankton cells out of the euphotic zone during the study period.

Corresponding editor: William Li


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.