Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on August 21, 2008
Journal of Plankton Research 2008 30(11):1285-1295; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbn082
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/11/1285    most recent
fbn082v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piirsoo, K.
Right arrow Articles by Viik, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Piirsoo, K.
Right arrow Articles by Viik, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Temporal and spatial patterns of phytoplankton in a temperate lowland river (Emajõgi, Estonia)

Kai Piirsoo*, Peeter Pall, Arvo Tuvikene and Malle Viik

Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Limnology, Riia 181, 51014 Tartu, Estonia

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: kai.piirsoo{at}emu.ee

Received on December 5, 2007; accepted on August 2, 2008


   Abstract

For the first time, a general survey is presented of the temporal and spatial patterns of the phytoplankton community in the River Emajõgi, one of the largest Estonian rivers. The species composition of phytoplankton in the River Emajõgi resembles that of Lake Võrtsjärv from which the river arises. The cyanobacteria Limnothrix planctonica (Woloszynska) Meffert, Limnothrix redekei (Van Goor) Meffert and Planktolyngbya limnetica (Lemmermann) Komárková-Legnerova et Cronberg dominated the phytoplankton biomass. Phytoplankton abundance, biomass and chlorophyll a concentration showed an increasing trend from spring to late autumn. The results of principal component analysis revealed that the first and the second axes explained 43.6% and 14.5% of total variance, respectively. The first principal component was positively correlated with pH, O2, BOD5 as well as with phytoplankton parameters, and negatively correlated with water level, transparency and concentrations of nitrite and carbonate. The second principal component was positively correlated with chemical oxygen demand and negatively correlated with the concentrations of ammonium and total phosphorus. Projection of the cases on the factor plane indicated that the water of the upper reach of the river and the water of the River Pedja differed significantly from each other as well as from the waters of a majority of other rivers.


Corresponding editor: Roger Harris


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.