Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on July 25, 2008
Journal of Plankton Research 2008 30(11):1215-1231; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbn078
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/11/1215    most recent
fbn078v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gentleman, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Neuheimer, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gentleman, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Neuheimer, A. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Functional responses and ecosystem dynamics: how clearance rates explain the influence of satiation, food-limitation and acclimation

W. C. Gentleman* and A. B. Neuheimer

Department of Engineering Mathematics and Internetworking, Dalhousie University, 1340 Barrington St, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 1Y9

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: wendy.gentleman{at}dal.ca

Received on April 30, 2008; accepted on July 23, 2008


  Abstract

Modellers have long been aware that the mathematical form of zooplankton mortality, or closure, significantly affects the dynamics of planktonic ecosystem models. Another important formulation is the functional response, i.e. how ingestion rates change with prey density. Here we explain why different grazing responses can have profoundly differing influences on modelled dynamics, and how common practices may limit models due to misguided characterization of feeding behaviours. Use of different ingestion functions in a Nutrient–Phytoplankton–Zooplankton (NPZ) model results in oscillating versus constant densities. Contrary to the conclusions of previous studies, it is shown that these results are not due to zooplankton satiation versus non-satiation. Analysis of a predator-prey model is used to derive the necessary condition for ecological stability, which is related to food-limited clearance rates. Sensitivity studies demonstrate that zooplankton clearance rates have a strong influence on the dynamics of more complex models. Moreover, it is shown that acclimation time lags can dramatically alter results from those where zooplankton instantly adapt to changing prey densities due to the corollary effect on clearance rates. These results are discussed in terms of practical advice to modellers who face uncertainty in choosing expressions for the functional response.

Corresponding editor: Roger Harris


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.