Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on July 23, 2008
Journal of Plankton Research 2008 30(11):1207-1214; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbn077
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/11/1207    most recent
fbn077v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Serra, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carmona, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Serra, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carmona, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

When to be sexual: sex allocation theory and population density-dependent induction of sex in cyclical parthenogens

Manuel Serra, Eduardo Aparici and María José Carmona*

Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat I Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, A.O. 22085, E46071-València, Spain

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: maria.j.carmona{at}uv.es

Received on May 29, 2008; accepted on July 21, 2008


   Abstract

The timing of sex is a critical fitness component in the cyclically parthenogenetic life-cycle of rotifers. It has been hypothesized that sex in rotifers is optimally timed to high population density because male–female encounters are more probable. Because sexual females produce either males or, if inseminated, diapausing eggs, the advantage of a higher male–female encounter rate is that allocation to male production can be lower. This is paradoxical in the context of the sex allocation theory developed for rotifers, as the theory predicts equal numbers of male-producing and diapausing-egg producing females. We investigated this paradox using both empirical data and theoretical analysis. Laboratory and field data show that the proportion of male-producing sexual females decreases with population density, as expected from the male–female encounter probability hypothesis. However, this observation is shown to be consistent with the equal average sex allocation hypothesis. We conclude that the threshold age of fertilization (the oldest age for a sexual female to be fertilized) and the average population density at which sex occurs interact to produce an equal sex allocation. The evolutionary analysis of an equal sex allocation has to consider these two factors. We found that, if sex occurs at sufficiently low population density, it imposes a cost due to delayed maturity. We conjecture that the natural selection has adjusted the threshold age of fertilization to achieve an equal sex allocation, and that initiation of sex at high population densities has evolved for some other reason, for example, to increase the number of sexual females.


Corresponding editor: John Dolan


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.