Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on December 6, 2006
Journal of Plankton Research 2007 29(Supplement 1):i149-i162; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbl073
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/suppl_1/i149    most recent
fbl073v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schminke, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schminke, H. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Entomology for the copepodologist

Horst Kurt Schminke*

Institut für Biologie Und Umweltwissenschaften, Universität Oldenburg, Postfach 2503, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany

* Corresponding author: schminke{at}uni-oldenburg.de

Received on October 27, 2005; accepted on October 24, 2006


  Abstract

Copepods are often called ‘insects of the seas’. Is this justified? Today insects are regarded as the most successful group of animals. Measures of absolute success are phylogenetic age (survival through time), dominance (relative abundance, proportion of total biomass, role in energy flow, impact on ecosystems and coexisting organisms), speciosity, geographic range, and breadth of adaptive radiation. Measured by these criteria copepods are no less successful than insects. What about relative success? There must be intrinsic features in the structure and mode of life of insects which make them more successful relative to other animal groups. According to the literature these features are small size, metamorphosis, wings, and mouthparts. If the capacity to fly is equated with the capacity to swim copepods share all these intrinsic features being equal with insects also in relative success. Entomologists believe insects to be unmatched by other groups in most features of evolutionary success. Yet, they outdo copepods only in one respect: number of species. Reasons for this are greater spatial heterogeneity and architectural complexity (of vegetation) on land than in the sea as well as the fact that insects were among the first groups on land relatively unaffected by other groups, whereas copepods had to evolve in an already crowded world.

Communicating editor: R.P. Harris


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
A. J. Richardson
In hot water: zooplankton and climate change
ICES J. Mar. Sci., April 1, 2008; 65(3): 279 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.