Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on February 9, 2006
Journal of Plankton Research 2006 28(5):499-507; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi135
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/5/499    most recent
fbi135v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gismervik, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gismervik, I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Top-down impact by copepods on ciliate numbers and persistence depends on copepod and ciliate species composition

Ingrid Gismervik*

Department of Biology, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066, Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway

* Corresponding Author: ingrid.gismervik{at}bio.uio.no

Received September 9, 2005; accepted in principle December 12, 2005; accepted for publication February 3, 2006; published online February 9, 2006
Communicating editor: K.J. Flynn

Experiments with the copepods Acartia clausi, Centropages hamatus and Pseudocalanus sp. were performed to assess the species-specific effect of these copepods on the development of monospecific algae (Nephroselmis pyriformis) and ciliate communities (Strombidium vestitum, Strombidium conicum, Strombidium sp. and Lohmanniella oviformis). It was hypothesized that potentially switching copepods like A. clausi will stabilize the algal community by switching between ciliate and algal food, in contrast to copepods with stereotypic filter feeding behaviour (Pseudocalanus sp.). In treatments with Pseudocalanus sp. and C. hamatus, all ciliate species were wiped out in 2 days, resulting in blooms of N. pyriformis. In treatments with A. clausi, two of the ciliate species were able to persist, but the combined ciliate and copepod community was not able to control the algal bloom. Ciliates became abundant in control treatments without copepods, but only S. vestitum and S. conicum seemed able to establish grazing control. Hence, when evaluating the role of ciliates in food webs, their actual numbers and species composition should be taken into account. Likewise, the species composition of copepods may be crucial; these experiments demonstrate that small filter feeding copepods may have tremendous impact on ciliate numbers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
D. Calliari, A. Britos, and D. Conde
Testing the relationship between primary production and Acartia tonsa grazing pressure in an estuarine lagoon
J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2009; 31(9): 1045 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.