Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on October 26, 2004
Journal of Plankton Research 2005 27(1):11-17; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbh156pap
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/1/11    most recent
fbh156papv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beninger, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Decottignies, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Beninger, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Decottignies, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol. 27 No. 1 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

What makes diatoms attractive for suspensivores? The organic casing and associated organic molecules of Coscinodiscus perforatus are quality cues for the bivalve Pecten maximus

Peter G. Beninger* and Priscilla Decottignies

Laboratoire de Biologie Marine, Faculté Des Sciences, Université de Nantes, 44322 Nantes Cedex 03, France

* Corresponding Author: Peter.Beninger{at}univ-nantes.fr

Received June 28, 2004; accepted in principle August 31, 2004; accepted for publication September 6, 2004; published online October 6, 2004

A major question in the study of seston particle dynamics is the properties of particles which induce selection in suspension feeders. In order to determine whether the diatom organic casing and associated organic molecules (herein termed ‘perifrustular envelope’) influences selection by the Great Scallop Pecten maximus L., a mixed culture containing intact and naturally dead (empty frustules) Coscinodiscus perforatus was presented to normally feeding scallops. The presence of the envelope on all cells of the culture was verified using scanning electron microscopy. Proportions of intact and dead cells were determined via endoscopy-assisted sampling at strategic points in the particle processing chain. The use of C. perforatus as a food item was verified by microscopic examination of faeces at the end of the experiment. Selection indices were calculated to quantify eventual enrichment of empty, dead cell proportions at the rejection sites, in relation to the previous steps in the particle-processing chain. No significant difference was observed in the proportions of intact and dead cells at any of the sites, nor in the selection indices, and the large P-values suggest that both cell types were treated in the same manner by these actively feeding scallops (P = 0.760 and 0.839 for proportions and selection indices, respectively). Together with previous studies which have shown that empty, cleaned (perifrustular envelope absent) diatom frustules provoke rejection; these results strongly support the hypothesis that the presence of the external organic components is a major selection cue. This has implications for phytoplankton dynamics, notably with respect to the potential fates of species captured by this suspension feeder.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
E. P. Espinosa, M. Perrigault, J. E. Ward, S. E. Shumway, and B. Allam
Lectins Associated With the Feeding Organs of the Oyster Crassostrea virginica Can Mediate Particle Selection
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2009; 217(2): 130 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
P. G. Beninger, A. Valdizan, B. Cognie, F. Guiheneuf, and P. Decottignies
Wanted: alive and not dead: functioning diatom status is a quality cue for the suspension-feeder Crassostrea gigas
J. Plankton Res., June 1, 2008; 30(6): 689 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.