Skip Navigation

Journal of Plankton Research 2004 26(2):167-174; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbh011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Villafañe, V. E.
Right arrow Articles by Helbling, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Villafañe, V. E.
Right arrow Articles by Helbling, E. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Annual patterns of ultraviolet radiation effects on temperate marine phytoplankton off Patagonia, Argentina

Virginia E. Villafañe*, Elena S. Barbieri and E. Walter Helbling

Estacioón De Fotobiología Playa Unión & Consejo Nacional De Investigaciones Científicas Y Técnicas (Conicet), Rifleros 227, Playa Unión, (9103) Rawson, Chubut, Argentina

* Corresponding Author: virginia{at}efpu.org.ar

We carried out experiments to evaluate the effects of solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR; 280–400 nm) upon primary production of different natural phytoplankton assemblages (i.e. characteristic of a seasonal cycle) from Patagonia (Argentina) from January 2001 to January 2002. The short-term impact of UVR (i.e. measured as radiocarbon incorporation) was assessed by exposing samples to solar radiation under six radiation treatments: uncovered quartz tubes and tubes covered with different cut-off Schott filters (WG295, WG305, WG320, WG360), and Plexiglas UF-3 (cut-off at 400 nm), so that samples received radiation at five different intervals within the UVR in addition to photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and only PAR, respectively. Phytoplankton composition and abundance allowed us to differentiate pre-bloom, bloom and post-bloom periods, with pre- and post-bloom samples characterized by small cells (e.g. flagellates <10 µm), whereas the bloom was dominated by large diatoms (~50 µm). Absolute values of photosynthesis inhibition were lower during the bloom, but biological weighting functions (i.e. inhibition per unit energy) indicated that this assemblage was more sensitive to UVR (especially in the UV-B region, 280–320 nm) than those of the pre- and post-bloom periods. UV-A radiation (320–400 nm) accounted for most of the reduction in carbon incorporation (>60%), especially during the pre- and post-bloom periods. Most of the observed variability was inter-seasonal, although small intra-seasonal fluctuations were also observed. Our results indicate that the taxonomic composition and cellular size are especially important when addressing UVR effects upon these assemblages. However, other factors such as mixing can also contribute to the variability in responses to UVR.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
F. E. Ogbebo and C. Ochs
Bacterioplankton and phytoplankton production rates compared at different levels of solar ultraviolet radiation and limiting nutrient ratios
J. Plankton Res., November 1, 2008; 30(11): 1271 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.