Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogerson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rogerson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 25 | NUMBER 11 | PAGES 1359-1365 | 2003
© Oxford University Press; all rights reserved

Are planktonic naked amoebae predominately floc associated or free in the water column?

Andrew Rogerson*, O. Roger Anderson1 and Catherine Vogel

Oceanographic Center of Nova Southeastern University, 8000 N. Ocean Drive, Dania Beach, FL 33004 and 1 Biological Oceanography, Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA

* Corresponding Author: arogerso{at}nova.edu

The spatial distribution of planktonic naked amoebae in the waters of a mangrove and estuarine habitat was investigated. Amoebae were grouped either as ‘attached’ (when on suspended flocs) or ‘free’ (when floating in the open water). Consistent with previous studies, amoebae were numerically important in the water column. For example, in mangrove water from south Florida, they averaged 94 640 cells l-1. In the mangrove, 91.6% of planktonic amoebae were attached to suspended flocs. Likewise, the majority of amoebae in Hudson waters were floc associated (86.7%). The results using a novel capture protocol, employing suspended capillary tubes to catch floating amoebae, suggested that free amoebae readily colonized available surfaces. Transmission electron microscopy demonstrated that amoebae were capable of penetrating deep into the cracks and crevices of floc particles. The implications of these results are far reaching. For example, in the mangrove waters where the floc fraction in a liter of water accounted for ~0.5 ml volume, the absolute density of amoebae at these loci was 173 380 amoebae per milliliter of floc material. Such high local abundance may have important trophic implications, particularly if amoebae, because of their close association with surfaces, graze attached bacteria unavailable to other micrograzers. The results presented here clearly show that future studies on the microecology of flocs need to include amoebae as well as the more widely investigated ciliates and heterotrophic flagellates.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.