Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, M.
Right arrow Articles by Simard, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, M.
Right arrow Articles by Simard, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.23 no.5 pp.481-496, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

Hydrodynamic Control of Late Summer Species Composition and Abundance of Zooplankton in Hudson Bay and Hudson Strait (Canada)

Michel Harvey1,, Jean-Claude Therriault and Nathalie Simard

Division Des Sciences Océaniques, Ministère Des Pêches Et Des Océans, Institut Maurice-Lamontagne, C. P. 1000, Mont-Joli, Québec, Canada G5h 3z4

1 To Whom Correspondence Should Be Addressed

The spatial variation in zooplankton biomass, abundance and species composition in relation to hydrography and chlorophyll a (Chl a) was studied in the subarctic waters of Hudson Bay and Hudson Strait. Sampling was carried out in early September 1993 at 21 stations arranged along a transect following the Québec coast from James Bay, in Hudson Bay, to the vicinity of Ungava Bay in Hudson Strait. Both the biomass and the abundance of total zooplankton were low along the lower part of Hudson Bay (averaging 1.6 g DM m–2 and 9432 ind. m–2) and increased sharply toward the upper end of the Bay and in Hudson Strait (averaging 6.0 g DM m–2 and 40 583 ind. m–2). A total of 80 zooplankton taxa was identified in the samples. Copepods were clearly numerically dominant at all sampling stations, accounting for more than 85% and 93% of the zooplankton community in the Bay and the Strait, respectively. Clustering samples by their relative species composition revealed four groups distributed along well defined environmental gradients characterizing the distribution of physical variables and Chl a. The first group, located in the most southern region of Hudson Bay and farther offshore, northwest of the Belcher and Sleeper Islands, was strongly influenced by freshwater run-off from James Bay and other major rivers around the Bay, and was characterized by the presence of two euryhaline copepod species (Acartia longiremis and Centropages hamatus). The second and the third groups occupied the largest region along the sampling transect, from the middle of Hudson Bay to the western region of Hudson Strait, and were characterized by a typical arctic zooplankton fauna related to the cyclonic circulation in central Hudson Bay. The fourth group was located in the easternmost part of the sampling transect in Hudson Strait where the highest phytoplankton biomass values were observed (Chl a ~220 mg m–2). The zooplankton assemblage there showed an important increase in the abundance of the large herbivorous copepod Calanus glacialis/finmarchicus, which were numerically four times more abundant in the central Strait region (averaging 15 251 ind. m–2) than in the western side of Hudson Strait and in Hudson Bay (3629 ind. m–2). These results support the hypothesis that the structure in the local biological community is influenced by the local hydrodynamic features which, through their action on surface water temperature, salinity, stratification and mixing conditions, lead to spatial differentiation of the phytoplankton and zooplankton communities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.