Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ojala, A.
Right arrow Articles by Salonen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ojala, A.
Right arrow Articles by Salonen, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.23 no.11 pp.1207-1216, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

Productivity of Daphnia longispina in a highly humic boreal lake

Anne Ojala,1 and Kalevi Salonen,2

University Of Helsinki, Lammi Biological Station, Fin-16900 Lammi, Finland

Corresponding Author: ANNE.OJALA{at}HELSINKI.FI

1 Present Address: University Of Helsinki, Department Of Ecological And Environmental Sciences, Niemenkatu 73, Fin-15140 Lahti, Finland

2 Present Address: University Of Jyväskylä, Department Of Biological And Environmental Science, Pl 35, Fin-40351 Jyväskylä, Finland

The development of the Daphnia longispina (O. F. Müller) population in a highly humic boreal lake was followed throughout one growing season, and the amount of secondary production was estimated in relation to primary production and available food resources. The growth rate method was applied in the secondary production measurements. Daphnia longispina did not appear in the water column until 16 May, after which the animals were present throughout the growing season. The population showed three density peaks; the first appeared in early June, and the second and third in mid-July and at the beginning of September, respectively. Somatic production followed a seasonal pattern, with highest production rates in midsummer. The maximum value of 127 mg C m–2day–1 was recorded at the beginning of July. The total annual net production of D. longispina was 7.9 g C m–2. During most of the growing season, the primary productivity in the lake was well below 100 mg C m–2 day–1 and the total annual productivity of photosynthetic algae was 5.0 g C m–2. We conclude that in this lake the zooplankton population did not rely on phytoplankton primary production as a sole carbon source, but that most of the carbon must have originated from bacterial production either directly or through a microbial loop.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.