Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Field, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reeves, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Field, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reeves, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.22 no.7 pp.1299-1309, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000

Efficient sampling design for larvae of American lobster

C. Field, R.J. Miller1 and A. Reeves1

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4J1 and 1 Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, B2Y 4A2, Canada

For 13 years, lobster larvae were collected from the same 23 stations at approximately weekly intervals for the duration of the larval season (Scarratt, 1964). Using the most complete 8 years of collections, we produced several data subsets for each year by reducing the number of sampling dates and the number of stations per date. Our analyses were confined to the fourth and final larval stage, the most likely stage to be correlated with fishery yields. The means and confidence intervals for annual larval abundance were calculated on the data subsets and compared with the full dataset. We conclude that the usual lobster larval sampling frequency of weekly, or more often, was unnecessary. Tows taken at 10 or 14 stations per week for 4 weeks of the 9 week larval season represented well the mean and confidence intervals on the full dataset. These choices remained the best after the costs of sampling were included. Further cost reduction could be achieved without loss of precision by removing collections from the net after every second, rather than after every tow. Mean annual density was found to be a good index of annual larval production. Thus, the collections during 4 weeks represented annual abundance and annual production.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.