Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steitz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Velimirov, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Steitz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Velimirov, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.21 no.12 pp.2341-2360, 1999
© Oxford University Press 1999

Contribution of Picocyanobacteria to total primary production and community respiratory losses in a backwater system

A. Steitz and B. Velimirov1

Institut für Medizinische Biologie, Arbeitsgruppe Mikrobiologie, Universität Wien, Währingerstraße 10, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed

The contribution of autotrophic picoplankton (APP) to phytoplanktonic primary production, investigated during the phytoplankton growing season (March–September) in a macrophyte-dominated backwater system near Vienna, showed that APP mainly consisted of rod-shaped and coccoid cyanobacteria. Two stations were examined, exhibiting similar seasonal patterns in the development of picocyanobacteria, although the two sites differed in picocyanobacterial cell numbers and biomass by a factor of 1.5. Cell numbers determined by epifluorescence microscopy varied between 0.29 x 104 and 34.5 x 104 cells ml–1 at Station 1, and between 0.23 x 104 and 19.1 x 104 cells ml–1 at Station 2. At both sites, the mean cell volume of picocyanobacteria was 0.5 µm3. Carbon fixation in the planktonic community of the Kühwörter Wasser was dominated primarily by larger phytoplankton, although the picoplankton community sometimes supplied up to 74% (mean: 35%) of total primary production. Distinct differences in chlorophyll a concentrations and primary production between the two sites refer to a greater competition between phytoplankton and macrophytes at Station 2. Community respiration deviated greatly in time and in level at the two stations, showing a higher dynamic in community metabolism at Station 1. At this site, community respiration losses ranged between 12 and 100% of gross production. Hence, community metabolism comprised net autotrophic, balanced, and net heterotrophic situations over the investigation period, whereas at Station 2, only net autotrophic situations could be determined.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.