| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 18 | NUMBER 2 | PAGES 133-155 | 1996
© Oxford University Press
research-article |
Growth and decline of a diatom spring bloom phytoplankton species composition, formation of marine snow and the role of heterotrophic dinoflagellates
Kristineberg Marine Research Station S-450 34 Fiskebäckskil, Sweden 1Department of Marine Botany, Botanical Institute, Göteborg University Carl Skottsbergs gata 22, S-413 19 Goteborg, Sweden
During the spring of 1994, we determined the factors responsible for the decline of the seasonal diatom bloom in the Gullmar fjord, on the west coast of Sweden. Four species constituted >75% of the biomass—Detonula confervacea, Chaetoceros diadema, Skeletonema costatum and Thalassiosira nordenskioeldii—reaching concentrations of 4900, 350, 8200 and 270 cells ml–1, respectively. Growth of phytoplankton was exponential (growth rate = 0.12 day–1) from 3 to 21 March, after which a gale with winds >15 m s–1 caused massive aggregation. A maximum of 130 p.p.m. (v/v) of marine snow aggregates was observed by in situ video at the peak of the bloom. Critical concentrations (Jackson, Deep-Sea Res., 37, 1197–1211, 1990) were similar to observed showing that coagulation theory could explain the sudden decline of the bloom. The heterotrophic dinoflagellate Gyrodinium cf. spirale increased exponentially after the peak of the bloom with maximum (temperature-adjusted) growth rates. After the rapid aggregation and sedimentation of the bloom, they were able to control any further growth of diatoms. Nitrate and silicate were never depleted, but phosphate may have been limiting by the end of the study period. We conclude that mass aggregation during a gale marked the end of the bloom, and that intense grazing by heterotrophic dinoflagellates prevented any subsequent increase of diatoms.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. J. Doubell, H. Yamazaki, H. Li, and Y. Kokubu An advanced laser-based fluorescence microstructure profiler (TurboMAP-L) for measuring bio-physical coupling in aquatic systems J. Plankton Res., December 1, 2009; 31(12): 1441 - 1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Gribble, G. Nolan, and D. M. Anderson Biodiversity, biogeography and potential trophic impact of Protoperidinium spp. (Dinophyceae) off the southwestern coast of Ireland J. Plankton Res., November 1, 2007; 29(11): 931 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. C. Roberts, K. Davidson, and L. C. Gilpin Response of temperate microplankton communities to N:Si ratio perturbation J. Plankton Res., December 1, 2003; 25(12): 1485 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Poder, S. Y Maestrini, M. Balode, U. Lips, C. Bechemin, A. Andrushaitis, and I. Purina The role of inorganic and organic nutrients on the development of phytoplankton along a transect from the Daugava River mouth to the Open Baltic, in spring and summer 1999 ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2003; 60(4): 827 - 835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Engel The role of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the increase in apparent particle stickiness ({alpha}) during the decline of a diatom bloom J. Plankton Res., March 1, 2000; 22(3): 485 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.W. Hansen, B.H. Hygum, M. Brozek, F. Jensen, and C. Rey Food web interactions in a Calanus finmarchicus dominated pelagic ecosystem--a mesocosm study J. Plankton Res., March 1, 2000; 22(3): 569 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|