Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grobbelaar, J. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Grobbelaar, J. U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 12 | NUMBER 5 | PAGES 923-931 | 1990
© Oxford University Press


research-article

Modelling phytoplankton productivity in turbid waters with small euphotic to mixing depth ratios

Johan U. Grobbelaar

Department of Botany, University of the OFS Bloemfontein, South Africa

Received on October 5, 1989; accepted on April 16, 1990 A model which was developed and calibrated for predicting algal growth in mass cultures, was modified for natural systems. In turbid systems the ratio of euphotic to aphotic depth is usually small and mixing may exceed the compensation depth. In order to compensate for the various light regimes to which the phytoplankton would be subjected, the losses due to dark respiration were modified so that the effective light history would determine the actual rate. The efficiency of light utilization also changes under different light regimes and the model was modified to take these variations into account. Both these modifications resulted in different production profiles being generated for the same surface conditions, but with different mixing depths, where the phytoplankton become more efficient as the light regime deteriorates (i.e. less respiration and greater light utilization efficiency). A further consequence is that the ‘critical mixing depth’ is {small tilde}2.5 times greater than that which was previously accepted, being {small tilde}20 times the euphotic depth. The model predicted productivities to within 90% of observed rates. It was also suggested how the predictions could be used to determine the extent of nutrient limitation. The predictions also have biomanipulatory consequences, as alterations of the light regime through the addition of non-photosynthesizing materials, under certain conditions, may even result in a stimulation of phytoplankton productivity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.