Skip Navigation



JPR Advance Access published online on June 28, 2009
Journal of Plankton Research, doi:10.1093/plankt/fbp044
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/9/965    most recent
fbp044v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flynn, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mitra, A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Flynn, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mitra, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Building the "perfect beast": modelling mixotrophic plankton

Kevin J. Flynn* and Aditee Mitra

Institute of Environmental Sustainability, Wallace Building, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, UK

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: k.j.flynn{at}swansea.ac.uk

Received on April 6, 2009; accepted on May 22, 2009


  Abstract

A mechanistic model is described for carbon–nitrogen–phosphorous-based interactions within a protistan mixotroph. The model describes interactions between photosynthesis (with photoacclimation), inorganic nutrient acquisition and the consumption of prey, making use of a flexible structure to allow an exploration of alternative modes of interaction. Operation can be varied with respect to differential growth rates under pure phototrophy, phago-heterotrophy or mixotrophy, substitutional or additive interactions between modes of C acquisition, the suppression of digestion by C flow from photosynthesis (including, if applicable, that from kleptochloroplasts), competition for volume within the cell between chloroplasts and food vacuole, the need for some level of obligatory photosynthetic activity, activation of mixotrophy in response to general growth limitation, or to specific nutrient limitations. Simulations under dynamic conditions include considerations of predation on bacteria, and on microalgae. These show the potential for mixotrophs, but also indicate the importance of using an appropriate description of their physiology, with different mixotrophy configurations having significant effects on system dynamics. The potential value of kleptochloroplasts for support of mixotroph growth is highest when the food vacuole is large, when the ingested phototroph prey is of good nutritional status and when digestion of prey is repressed by photosynthesis. Analyses of the behaviour of the new model demonstrate that simulations which do not consider the stoichiometric implications of mixotrophy cannot reflect the reality of the trophic interaction both for the mixotroph and for the associated ecosystem.

We dedicate this work to the memory of Mike Fasham FRS, without whose enthusiasm and guidance none of this would have come to pass.

Corresponding editor: John Dolan


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.