Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jarvis, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Combrink, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jarvis, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Combrink, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 9 | NUMBER 6 | PAGES 1231-1249 | 1987
© Oxford University Press


research-article

Zooplankton feeding on size fractionated Microcystis colonies and Chlorella in a hypertrophic lake (Hartbeespoort Dam, South Africa): implications to resource utilization and zooplankton succession

Andrew C. Jarvis, Robert C. Hart1 and Susan Combrink

1Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University PO Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa National Institute for Water Research, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research PO Box 395, Pretoria 0001, South Africa

Received on June 26, 1987; accepted on August 28, 1987 Experiments measuring zooplankton filtration rates on radiolabelled Chlorella and on Microcystis colonies were carried out in situ during both the annual spring Daphnia phase and following the shift to the summer Ceriodaphnia phase in Hartbeespoort Dam. Cladoceran filtration rates on natural Microcystis of discrete colony size-classes (5–20, 20–40, 40–60 and 60–100 µm) were compared with rates measured on cultured Chlorella (~ 8.5 µm cell diameter). The small bodied cladoceran species Ceriodaphnia reticulata, Moina micrura and Diaphanosoma exasum filtered Microcystis colonies at very low rates compared to Chlorella. Only the largest herbivore Daphnia pulex fed significantly on Microcystis colonies of up to 60–100 µm. Colonies of 100–150 µm were not ingested by any zooplankter tested. Both particle size limitation and low filtration rates on small Microcystis colonies and unicells led to low Daphnia filtration efficiencies and reduced grazing pressure on Microcystis. Suppression of Daphnia filtration rates in situ on Chlorella was evident during the mid-summer increase in Microcystis abundance.Daphnia filtration rates during this period when inedible phytoplankton were abundant were only 25–36% of the maximum filtration, rates measured during the spring clear water phase when the phytoplankton was largely composed of edible species. The aforementioned small cladoceran species exhibited high filtration rates on Chlorella when Microcystis was abundant, suggesting that filtration efficiency of the summer cladoceran community was not reduced by interference from Microcystis colonies. However, their low filtration rate on Microcystis suggests that this is not an important food resource. Concomitant reductions in bacterial numbers and edible phytoplankton food resources available in summer imply that the small body-sized cladoceran community rather relies on the smallest size fraction of the summer food resource.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
R. Kurmayer, G. Christiansen, and I. Chorus
The Abundance of Microcystin-Producing Genotypes Correlates Positively with Colony Size in Microcystis sp. and Determines Its Microcystin Net Production in Lake Wannsee
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2003; 69(2): 787 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.