Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tilzer, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tilzer, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 9 | NUMBER 3 | PAGES 535-552 | 1987
© Oxford University Press


research-article

Bacterial response to seasonal changes in primary production and phytoplankton biomass in Lake Constance

Meinhard Simon1 and Max M. Tilzer

Limnological Institute, University of Constance PO Box 5560, D-7750 Konstanz, FRG

Received on July 4, 1986; accepted on February 28, 1987

Parameters characterizing bacterial biomass and metabolic activity are compared with phytoplankton biomass and daily primary production rates throughout the year. Between late March (before the onset of the phytoplankton spring bloom) and mid-July (diatom maximum), bacterial degradation of organic matter was more closely related to phytoplankton productivity than during the rest of the year. Bacterial production (as estimated by amino acid net uptake) was significantly correlated with concentrations of chlorophyll {alpha} and pheopigments. However, bacterial production was correlated less closely with primary production and only weakly with bacterial biomass. Bacterial biomass was also only weakly correlated with primary production but significantly with pheopigments. Numbers of active bacteria as estimated by autoradiography covaried closely with bacterial production and cell numbers. Whenever bacterial production was low, enhanced proportions of amino acids were respired. Oxygen consumption measurements showed that the size fraction <3 µm contributed 25–75% to total respiration. On average, bacterial biomass comprised 11 % of paniculate organic matter and roughly equalled phytoplankton biomass. During the growing season, bacterial production in the uppermost 20 m comprised about 20% of phytoplankton production with large seasonal fluctuations. A tentative carbon budget of the euphotic zone including primary production, zooplankton grazing, bacterial production and sedimentation is presented.

1Present address: Institute of Marine Resources A-018, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.