Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langdon, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Langdon, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 9 | NUMBER 3 | PAGES 459-482 | 1987
© Oxford University Press

research-article

On the causes of interspecific differences in the growth-irradiance relationship for phytoplankton. Part I. A comparative study of the growth-irradiance relationship of three marine phytoplankton species: Skeletonema costatum, Olisthodiscus luteus and Gonyaulax tamarensis

Christopher Langdon1

Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI 02881, USA

Received on May 30, 1986; accepted on February 4, 1987

Three marine phytoplankton species (Skeletonema costatum, Olisthodiscus luteus andGonyaulax tamarensis) were grown in batch cultures at 15°C and a 14:10 L:D cycle at irradiance levels ranging from 5 to 450 µEinst m–2 s–1. At each irradiance, during exponential growth, concurrent measurements were made of cell division, carbon-specific growth rate, photosynthetic performance (both O2 and POC production), dark respiration, and cellular composition in terms of C, N and chlorophyll a. The results indicate that the three species were similar with respect to chemical composition, C:N (atomic) = 6.9 ± 0.4, photo-synthetic quotient, 1.43 ± 0.09, and photosynthetic efficiency, 2.3 ±0.1 x 10–3 µmol O2 (µg Chl a)–1 h–1 (µEinst m–2 s–1)–1. Differences in maximum growth rate varied as the –0.24 power of cell carbon. Differences in growth efficiency, were best explained by a power function of Chl a:C at µ = 0. Compensation intensities, ranged from 1.1 µEinst m–2 s–1 for S. costatum to 35 forG. tamarensis and were found to be a linear function of the maintenance respiration rate. The results indicate that interspecific differences in the µ–I relationship can be adequately explained in terms of just three parameters: cell carbon at maximum growth rate, the C:Chl a ratio (at the limit as growth approaches zero) and the respiration rate at zero growth rate. A light-limited algal growth model based on these results gave an excellent fit to the experimental µ–I curves and explained 97% of the observed interspecific variability.

1Present address: Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory Columbia of University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
T. Yamamoto, T. Seike, T. Hashimoto, and K. Tarutani
Modelling the population dynamics of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium Tamarense in Hiroshima Bay, Japan
J. Plankton Res., January 1, 2002; 24(1): 33 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.