Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fryer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fryer, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 9 | NUMBER 3 | PAGES 419-432 | 1987
© Oxford University Press


research-article

The feeding mechanisms of the Daphniidae (Crustacea: Cladocera): recent suggestions and neglected considerations

Geoffrey Fryer

Freshwater Biological Association The Ferry House, Far Sawrey, Ambleside, Cumbria LA22 0LP , UK

Received on October 22, 1985; accepted on February 16, 1987 While the importance of grazing by anomopod cladocerans of the family Daphniidae on crops of planktonic algae and bacteria, and on detritus, is widely recognized, and although many calculations have been made on the filtering rate of these crustaceans, the feeding mechanisms involved in these processes have frequendy been misinterpreted by ecologists. Recent accounts that purport to describe the feeding mechanism of Daphnia are based on misinterpretations of morphology and are completely erroneous. The ancestors of daphniids were probably benthic, littoral animals, similar in various respects to primitive represcritatives of extant chydorids and macrothricids. The feeding mechanisms of the latter give useful indications of the kind of device from which that of the daphniids probably arose. The daphniid mechanism was derived by restricting particle abstraction to trunk limbs 3 and 4. Contraiy to recent claims, mink limbs 1 and 2 are not involved in this element of the feeding process. Comparative studies on many anomopods reveal invariable correlations. Species employing currents to cany food particles have filter plates bearing filtratory setules. Species that, for whatever reason, do not employ currents, except sometimes for respiration, have homologous structures that lack filtratory setules, even when, as is often the case, they feed on particulate matter. Comparisons with other branchiopods are also helpful.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.