Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fee, E.J.
Right arrow Articles by Welch, H.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fee, E.J.
Right arrow Articles by Welch, H.A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 9 | NUMBER 2 | PAGES 305-316 | 1987
© Oxford University Press

research-article

Phytoplankton photosynthesis parameters in central Canadian lakes

E.J. Fee, R.E. Hecky and H.A. Welch

Freshwater Institute, 501 University Crescent Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N6

Received on February 1, 1985; accepted on December 1, 1986 Values for two biological parameters — (i) PBm, the light saturated rate of photosynthesis per unit of chlorophyll and (ii) {alpha}, the slope of the light limited part of the photosynthesis versus light curve per unit of chlorophyll — must be known in order to be able to estimate rates of phytoplankton primary production from chlorophyll data. These parameters were measured for periods of up to 9 years in central Canadian lakes located in temperate, subarctic and arctic climatic zones. Regardless of their geographic locations, lakes where integral photosynthesis was nutrient limited had lower values of these parameters than did lakes where integral photosynthesis was light limited. Temperature set an upper limit to the variability of PBm but was not a good predictor of its actual value. Year-to-year variability of photosynthesis parameters in the most intensively studied group of lakes was large: annual means varied by a factor of three over a 9-year period. Until the sources and extent of this variability are known, accurate production estimates can be obtained from chlorophyll data only if PBm and {alpha} are measured in each water body and in every year. Implications for estimating primary production from remotely-sensed chlorophyll data are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.