Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vézina, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vézina, A. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 8 | NUMBER 5 | PAGES 939-956 | 1986
© Oxford University Press

research-article

Body size and mass flow in freshwater plankton: models and tests

Alain F. Vézina

McGill University, Biology Department Stewart Building, 1205 Avenue Docreur Penfield, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1B1 1Present address: Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Bedford Institute of Oceanography P.O. Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada B2Y 4A2

Received on August 1, 1985; accepted on April 1, 1986 Observations of radiotracer (32P) flow in size-fractionated lake plankton were compared with the predictions of size-dependent models of material flow. The models assume that the metabolic activity and turnover of the size fractions can be described as power functions of size (Y=aMb) One model, called size-structured, is an application of the Platt and Denman formalism: it assumes that materials are incorporated preferentially by the smallest organisms and flow continuously toward the larger organisms. In this model, the trophodynamic flow from a size fraction is constrained to the next larger fraction. The tracer data indicated that metabolic activity could indeed be described as a continuous function of size, at least within the microplankton (< 75 µm), but it did not support the hypothesis of a size-hierarchical trophodynamic flow. Another model limited the size range of predators to the larger (> 10 µm), size fractions while relaxing the size dependence constraint on the trophodynamic flow. This ‘unstructured’ model agreed better with the 32P dynamics and generated estimates of seston P uptake and of the rates of biomass turnover that compared favorably with published estimates for oligotrophic lakes. Some problems with the fit to the data remain but might be dealt with by distinguishing a priori among functional types of planktonic organisms through fluorescence (flow cytometry) or metabolic properties (inhibitors).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. A. Marquet, R. A. Quinones, S. Abades, F. Labra, M. Tognelli, M. Arim, and M. Rivadeneira
Scaling and power-laws in ecological systems
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2005; 208(9): 1749 - 1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.