JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 7 | NUMBER 4 | PAGES 519-535 | 1985
© Oxford University Press
research-article |
Diurnal variations in photosynthetic rates: comparisons of ultraphytoplankton with a larger phytoplankton size fraction
Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences McKown Point, West Boothbay Harbor, ME 04575, USA
Received on July 1, 1984; accepted on April 1, 1985 We compared the composition and photosynthetic activity of two size fractions of phytoplankton during a cruise from the Gulf of Maine to the Sargasso Sea in August 1983. At every station, and at every depth, ultraplankton (defined here as cells passing through 3 µm pores in filters) made a major contribution to both the standing crop of chlorophyll and the rate of primary production. Ultraphytoplankton assemblages were dominated by phycoerythrin-rich cyanobacteria. Overall, the ultraplankton contribution to total primary production was greatest at low photon fluxes: (i) at the beginning and end of the photoperiod; (ii) with increasing depth in the euphotic zone; and (iii) when daily irradiance was low. The composition of ultraphytoplankton varied with depth. Surface (2 m) ultraphytoplankton assemblages were almost exclusively composed of phycoerythrin-rich cyanobacteria with smaller (0.2–0.8 µm) cyanobacteria predominating. Below the surface mixed-layer, the proportion of larger (0.8–3 0 µm) to smaller cyanobacteria increased and the eukaryotic component of the ultraphytoplankton often became important. At two Sargasso Sea stations, the greatest numbers of cyanobacteria were below the mixed layer at the 1% light level, while the maximum numbers of eukaryotic ultraphytoplankters occurred deeper still, at the 0.5% light level, coincident with the chlorophyll maximum. At the bottom of the euphotic layer in the Sargasso Sea. eukaryotes numerically dominated the ultraphytoplankton and made a major contribution to the chlorophyll maximum.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Brunet, R. Casotti, and V. Vantrepotte Phytoplankton diel and vertical variability in photobiological responses at a coastal station in the Mediterranean Sea J. Plankton Res., June 1, 2008; 30(6): 645 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. E. Glover, C. Garside, and C. C. Trees Physiological responses of Sargasso Sea picoplankton to nanomolar nitrate perturbations J. Plankton Res., March 1, 2007; 29(3): 263 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Y.-H. Gin, X. Lin, and S. Zhang Dynamics and size structure of phytoplankton in the coastal waters of Singapore J. Plankton Res., August 1, 2000; 22(8): 1465 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Steitz and B. Velimirov Contribution of Picocyanobacteria to total primary production and community respiratory losses in a backwater system J. Plankton Res., December 1, 1999; 21(12): 2341 - 2360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. B. RIVKIN and M. PUTT Diel Periodicity of Photosynthesis in Polar Phytoplankton: Influence on Primary Production Science, November 27, 1987; 238(4831): 1285 - 1288. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|