Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, F.B.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, R.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, F.B.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, R.R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 6 | NUMBER 5 | PAGES 721-731 | 1984
© Oxford University Press


research-article

Estimation of sample zooplankton abundance from Folsom splitter sub-samples

F.B. Griffiths1, G.H. Brown2, D.D. Reid2 and R.R. Parker1,*

1Division of Fisheries Research, CSIRO Marine Laboratories PO Box 21, Cronulla, NSW 2230, Australia 2Division of Mathematics and Statistics, CSIRO PO Box 218, Lindfield, NSW 2070, Australia

Received on December 1, 1983; accepted on April 1, 1984

Procedures are described for estimating the abundance of each zooplanklon species in a sample after counting at least two sub-samples from a Folsom splitter. A multinomiai model is assumed for the splitting process. The method may be summarized as follows: two sub-samples, balanced with respect to the left — right splits, are counted. The counts for each species are tested for homogeneity using a x2 test. If the counts are homogeneous, an estimator is given which permits the estimation of the number of animals in the sample, and the variance of this estimate. If the subsample counts are heterogeneous, it is assumed that clumping has occurred. A procedure is described in which additional sub-samples are counted to locate the clump, and estimators of abundance (and variance estimators) are derived. If the splitter bias is <5%, bias of the abundance estimator is negligible compared to the binomial sampling error. Comparisons of species abundance between plankton samples is made more rigorous using the estimates of mean abundance, and the variance of this mean, provided by the methods described here.

*Present address: Dunoon Road, Dorroughby, NSW 2480, Australia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.