Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on January 15, 2009
Journal of Plankton Research 2009 31(5):503-513; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbn133
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/5/503    most recent
fbn133v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagiller, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sommaruga, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nagiller, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sommaruga, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Differential tolerance of UV radiation between Chaoborus species and role of photoprotective compounds

Karin Nagiller and Ruben Sommaruga*

Laboratory of Aquatic Photobiology and Plankton Ecology, Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: ruben.sommaruga{at}uibk.ac.at

Received on November 3, 2008; accepted on December 20, 2008


  Abstract

Previous studies with larvae of the American species Chaoborus punctipennis suggest that this genus is highly sensitive to solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR). Here, we first tested the UV sensitivity of late-instar larvae of two European Chaoborus species collected from a fishless shallow lake and second assessed their strategies to minimize UV damage. Exposure of late-instar larvae of C. pallidus to artificial UVR caused 50% mortality at a dose of 63.9 J cm–2. In contrast, no mortality was observed in C. obscuripes at the same or even at a higher dose (85.1 J cm–2). Several UV-absorbing compounds identified as mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) were found by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis in C. obscuripes [mean total MAAs: 0.142 µg mg–1 dry weight (DW)], but not in C. pallidus. Larvae of C. flavicans also had the same suite of MAAs (shinorine, mycosporine-glycine, palythine, usujirene and palythene) and similar MAAs concentration (0.186 µg mg–1 DW) as C. obscuripes, whereas C. crystallinus had very low concentrations (0.008 µg mg–1 DW) and only two MAAs. The same suite of MAAs found in larvae of C. obscuripes was also detected in pupae, adult midges and eggs of this species. Whereas C. obscuripes was able to accumulate MAAs through the diet, the origin of these secondary metabolites in the lake remains unclear. Our results indicate that sensitivity to UVR in Chaoborus is species-specific and suggest that resistance in C. obscuripes is associated with the presence of photoprotective compounds. Populations of UV-sensitive Chaoborus species may be at disadvantage in water bodies becoming more transparent to UVR as consequence of climate change.

Corresponding editor: John Dolan


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.