Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on August 1, 2009
Journal of Plankton Research 2009 31(10):1249-1263; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbp068
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/10/1249    most recent
fbp068v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marques, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Pardal, M. A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marques, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Pardal, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Evaluation of estuarine mesozooplankton dynamics at a fine temporal scale: the role of seasonal, lunar and diel cycles

Sónia Cotrim Marques1,*, Ulisses Miranda Azeiteiro1,2, Filipe Martinho1, Ivan Viegas1 and Miguel Ângelo Pardal1

1 Institute of Marine Research (IMAR), c/o Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal 2 Department of Science and Technology, Universidade Aberta, 4200-055 Porto, Portugal

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: scotrim{at}ci.uc.pt

Received on April 21, 2009; accepted on July 11, 2009


  Abstract

In order to study the influence of physical forcing at different temporal scales, zooplankton was sampled at a fixed station located at the mouth of Mondego estuary (southern Europe). Samples were collected during diel cycles, over neap and spring tides. Zooplankton abundance and diversity were estimated for each sampling period. Holoplankton were dominated by three taxa: Copepoda, with 48% of total zooplankton abundance, Cladocera (16%) and Medusae (12%). Meroplankton occurred mainly as barnacle and decapod larvae. Copepoda were the most diverse group, represented by 26 species followed by Decapoda larvae (21) and Medusae (16). In order to assess significant differences between seasons, a univariate analysis was carried out. Higher abundance and diversity were found in warm months, particularly at neap tides, when water temperature and salinity were higher. Multivariate analysis revealed significant seasonal differences in species composition. The estuarine community was strongly dependent on allochthonous events, such as tidal exchange and river inflow. The results of our study show that the period of higher river flow, coincident with winter, resulted in changes in the zooplankton community. Short-term temporal variations in the species composition and abundance were also attributed to tidal and diel cycles. Zooplankton reached significantly higher densities at night (P < 0.05), suggesting the occurrence of vertical migrations. By emphasizing the importance of different timescale changes in the zooplankton community of the Mondego estuary, this study will be useful for the design of more efficient sampling programs, aiming at documenting changes in the zooplankton at a broad but also at a fine temporal scale.

Corresponding editor: Mark J. Gibbons


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.