Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on May 6, 2008
Journal of Plankton Research 2008 30(8):885-892; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbn051
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/8/885    most recent
fbn051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Attayde, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Menezes, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Attayde, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Menezes, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Effects of fish biomass and planktivore type on plankton communities

José Luiz Attayde* and Rosemberg F. Menezes

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Centro de Biociências, Departamento de Botânica, Ecologia e Zoologia, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte 59072-970, Brazil

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: attayde{at}cb.ufrn.br

Received on February 20, 2008; accepted on May 1, 2008


  Abstract

We performed a field experiment in 15 fish ponds manipulating the size and biomass of the Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, to test the hypothesis that the effects of planktivorous fish on plankton dynamics and community structure depend on the planktivore type and fish-stocking biomass. Juveniles and adult tilapia were either stocked alone or combined in the same proportion at 20 and 40 g/m3. Because tilapias show an ontogenetic niche shift from visual predation on zooplankton to filter (suction) feeding on both zooplankton and phytoplankton, we expected differences in the biomass-related effects of juveniles and adults on plankton communities. Our results show that rotifer abundances were higher in treatments stocked with juvenile tilapia whereas cladoceran abundances were higher in treatments stocked with adults. However, total zooplankton and copepod abundances, chlorophyll a concentrations and Secchi depth were not affected by tilapia size, suggesting that variation in the feeding mode of tilapias affects the structure of zooplankton communities but that this does not cascade down to affect phytoplankton biomass and water transparency. Competitive interactions among the fish constrained their potential to depress zooplankton abundances and increase algal biomass as fish-stocking biomass increased. Competition among size classes of tilapias was highly asymmetric and juveniles were better competitors than adults for plankton resources in our experimental ponds.

Corresponding editor: Mark Gibbons


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.