Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on December 5, 2007
Journal of Plankton Research 2008 30(3):261-273; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbm104
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/3/261    most recent
fbm104v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Llewellyn, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Llewellyn, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Microbial dynamics during the decline of a spring diatom bloom in the Northeast Atlantic

Carole A. Llewellyn1,*, Glen A. Tarran1, Chris P. Galliene1, Denise G. Cummings1, Alex De Menezes2, Andy P. Rees1, Jo L. Dixon1, Claire E. Widdicombe1, Elaine S. Fileman1 and Willie H. Wilson3

1 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1-3DH, UK 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, PO Box 147, Liverpool L69-3BX, UK 3 Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, 180 McKown Point Road, PO Box 475, West Boothbay Harbor, ME 04575, USA

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: call{at}pml.ac.uk

Received on July 16, 2007; accepted on November 29, 2007


  Abstract

The microbial dynamics during a spring diatom bloom decline was monitored in the Northeast Atlantic during a 5-day Lagrangian study (8–12 April 2002). Phytoplankton abundance, composition and health status were related to viral and bacterial abundance, zooplankton abundance and grazing rates, as well as bacterial production. Phytoplankton reached maximum concentration on Day 3 (Chl a >5 µg L–1) and declined on Day 5 (Chl a ~2 µg L–1) and was dominated (70% of Chl a) by diatoms. Bacterial production increased substantially to >20 µg C L–1 day–1 on Day 3 and concomitantly large viruses decreased in number by half to <10 x 103 mL–1. This was followed by a 5-fold increase in large viruses on Day 5, indicating infection and subsequent lysis on Days 3 and 5, respectively. Micro- and mesozooplankton grazing were not the principal cause for the decline of the bloom and pheophorbide-a showing little variation in concentration from Days 1–4 (~100 ng L–1) although doubled on Day 5. The poor physiological status of the diatoms, indicated by the high chlorophyllide-a concentrations (50–480 ng L–1), likely promoted a series of closely interrelated events involving bacteria and viruses leading to the demise of the diatom bloom.

Communicating editor: K.J. Flynn


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.