Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on November 23, 2007
Journal of Plankton Research 2008 30(1):57-64; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbm095
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/1/57    most recent
fbm095v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Claessens, M.
Right arrow Articles by Prast, M.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Claessens, M.
Right arrow Articles by Prast, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Concentration of fixed plankton samples via settling: how long is long enough?

Monika Claessens* and Mario Prast

Department of Organismal Biology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunner Strasse 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: monika.claessens{at}sbg.ac.at

Received on July 24, 2007; accepted on November 20, 2007


  Abstract

Enumerating plankton cells, especially ciliates, usually requires settling of samples in order to concentrate the cells. Poorly settled samples could introduce large errors into plankton counts. The time sufficient to settle all ciliates has, however, never been established in the literature. Here, using both theoretical and empirical studies, we suggest improvements of the current method, which mostly relies on experience to determine settling times. Ciliate density was used to calculate the theoretical settling time of fixed ciliates with the Stokes equation. To determine ciliate density (g mL–1), we modified and established a density gradient centrifugation method. We found that ciliate density was in the range 1.02–1.08 g mL–1. Additionally, empirical sinking rates were gathered semi-automatically with a digital camera system. The theoretical and experimental settling times were in the same range, though there were differences for some species. From this, we recommend working with the empirical sinking rates that are more reliable: 0.5 and 1.7 mm min–1 for fixed marine (at salinities of 16 and 40, respectively) samples and 2.4 mm min–1 for fixed freshwater samples. Using these rates potentially saves up to 95% of the time for settling compared to old, experience derived times. Although ciliate density was significantly correlated with settling rates, there was no correlation with particle size and shape.

Communicating editor: K.J. Flynn


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.