JPR Advance Access originally published online on November 23, 2007
Journal of Plankton Research 2008 30(1):1-5; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbm094
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HORIZONS |
How best to include the effects of climate-driven forcing on prey fields in larval fish individual-based models
1 Institute of Hydrobiology and Fisheries Science, Center for Marine and Climate Research, University of Hamburg, Olbersweg 24, 22767 Hamburg, Germany 2 Geophysical Institute, Bjerknes Center for Climate Research, University of Bergen, AllÉgaten 70, 5007 Bergen, Norway
* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: ute.daewel{at}uni-hamburg.de
Received on ; accepted on November 19, 2007
 |
Abstract |
|---|
If we intend to examine the indirect effects of climate variability on the vital rates of key marine species, climate-induced changes in the spatial-temporal dynamics of prey must be resolved. Recently, structured population simulations have been coupled to ecosystem (nutrient-phytoplankton-zooplankton-detritus, NPZD) models to derive prey fields. Model-derived prey fields offer advantages (e.g. increased spatial-temporal coverage, direct links to climate forcing). In contrast, employing structured population simulations (e.g. stage-based copepod models) has several disadvantages, including the lack of realistic utilization of phytoplankton production, the absence of boundary condition data and a vastly increased coupled model complexity. To avoid the pitfalls limiting the utility of structured population models, we argue for a more simple approach for obtaining a size-structured prey field using NPZD model estimates of bulk zooplankton carbon and in situ zooplankton abundance-at-size data. The approach was developed to obtain prey fields for a larval fish individual-based model (IBM), but the method may offer wide applicability. Moreover, our approach greatly simplifies the coupling of NPZD models and larval fish IBMs and is an example of the reduction in model complexity that will be critical to the development of end-to-end ecosystem models that use, for example, a rhomboid approach to examine trophodynamic climate impacts at basin scales.
Written responses to this article should be submitted to R. P. Harris at r.p.h@pml.ac.uk within two months of publication. For further information, please see the Editorial ‘Horizons’ in Journal of Plankton Research, Volume 26, Number 3, Page 257.