Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on July 15, 2007
Journal of Plankton Research 2007 29(9):775-789; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbm059
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/9/775    most recent
fbm059v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gélinas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Slusarczyk, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gélinas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Slusarczyk, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Alternative antipredator responses of two coexisting Daphnia species to negative size selection by YOY perch

Malorie Gélinas1,*, Bernadette Pinel-Alloul1,* and Miroslaw Slusarczyk2

1 Groupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologie et environnement aquatique (GRIL), Département de sciences biologiques, université de montréal, C.P. 6128 Succ. centre-ville, montréal, Québec, Canada H3C-3J7 2 Department of hydrobiology, University of warsaw, Banacha 2, 02-097 Warszawa, Poland

* Corresponding Author: malorie.gelinas{at}umontreal.ca (M.G.) or bernadette.pinel-alloul{at}umontreal.ca (B.P.-A.)

Received on May 22, 2007; accepted on July 12, 2007


   Abstract

Our study showed for the first time in nature that two coexisting Daphnia adopted alternative life history and behavioural strategies to cope with negative size-selection predation by gape-limited young-of-the-year (YOY) perch. We evaluated the phenotypic plasticity in life history and behavioural traits of two coexisting Daphnia species, D. pulicaria (2 mm) and D. galeata mendotae (1.4 mm), in response to seasonal changes in predation by YOY yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in a mesotrophic lake. We expected that the large-sized D. pulicaria, the most likely subjected to size-selective predation by YOY perch, will show stronger antipredator responses than the small-sized D. galeata mendotae. To test this hypothesis, we examined changes in life history and behavioural traits in juveniles and adults of both species during four YOY fish predation periods that were selected based on the presence of YOY perch in the pelagic zone and the relative abundance of Daphnia prey in their gut contents. Our study supports the scenario of negative size-selective predation by gape-limited YOY perch on both Daphnia species. The electivity index indicated that no daphnids with a body length > 1.75 mm were predated by YOY yellow perch. Coexisting Daphnia exhibited phenotypic plasticity in their antipredator defenses based on their vulnerability to seasonal changes in size-selective predation of YOY perch. Juvenile Daphnia were the targeted prey and they responded by a decreased body length. Behavioural defenses were the dominant strategy used by both adult Daphnia populations to withstand high predation. A decreased size at maturity was not employed by Daphnia, except at the very end of the predation period. Behavioural defenses are short-term strategy adopted to avoid predation. Both antipredator defenses became unnecessary expenses and were no longer sustained after the predation period.


Communicating editor: K.J. Flynn


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.