Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on January 23, 2007
Journal of Plankton Research 2007 29(3):263-274; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbm013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/3/263    most recent
fbm013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glover, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Trees, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Glover, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Trees, C. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Physiological responses of Sargasso Sea picoplankton to nanomolar nitrate perturbations

Hilary E. Glover1, Christopher Garside2,{dagger} and Charles C. Trees3,*,{ddagger}

1 Department of Natural and Social Sciences, University of Maine at Augusta, Maine 04330, USA 2 Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, W. Boothbay Harbor, Maine 04575, USA 3 Center for Hydro-Optics and Remote Sensing, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92120, USA

* Corresponding Author: trees{at}nurc.nato.int

Received on August 30, 2006; accepted on January 12, 2007


  Abstract

A study was conducted in July 1989 at three stations in the northern Sargasso Sea, where picoplankton (<1 µm) provided approximately half of the standing crop of chlorophyll. Temporal changes in the position of the nitracline at a single location indicated that the vertical supply of nitrate was not at ‘steady-state’ and phytoplankton distributions tracked the nitracline. Our main experimental objective was to examine the short-term effects of ecologically significant nitrate perturbations (+20 and +100 nM) on the physiology of <1 µm communities growing at low (nanomolar) ambient nitrate concentrations. A chemiluminescent nitrate method was used to measure the time course (up to 4 h) of nitrate disappearance at in situ irradiance, in parallel with measurements of photosynthetic 14CO2 assimilation. Picoplankton growing at <60 nM nitrate rapidly responded to nanomolar nitrate supplements with luxury consumption and enhanced photosynthesis in proportion to their ambient nitrate environment. Light-saturated Synechococcus populations from the most nitrate-depleted waters (13 nM) had doubled their cellular rate of photosynthesis after 4 h, in response to a 20 nM nitrate pulse.

{dagger} This manuscript is dedicated to C. Garside (Deceased), colleague and friend.

{ddagger} Present Address: Nato Undersea Research Centre, 19138 La Spezia, Italy

Communicating editor: K.J. Flynn


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.