Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on October 31, 2007
Journal of Plankton Research 2007 29(12):1087-1097; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbm083
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/12/1087    most recent
fbm083v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Havens, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by East, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Havens, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by East, T. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Plankton biomass partitioning in a eutrophic subtropical lake: comparison with results from temperate lake ecosystems

Karl E. Havens1,*, John R. Beaver2 and Therese L. East3

1 Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, University of Florida, 7922 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, FL 32653, USA 2 BSA Environmental Services, Beachwood, OH, USA 3 South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, USA

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: khavens{at}ufl.edu

Received on October 1, 2007; accepted on October 26, 2007


  Abstract

Plankton were sampled for 6 years in a subtropical eutrophic lake in FL, USA, and absolute and relative carbon biomass was determined for bacteria, phytoplankton, heterotrophic and phototrophic nanoflagellates, ciliates, rotifers and crustacean zooplankton. We compared the results with findings from a comprehensive study of carbon biomass partitioning in eutrophic German lakes with elucidate common patterns and differences. Similarities between the temperate and subtropical systems included: similar seasonal dynamics, with maximal carbon biomass of nanoflagellates and metazoan zooplankton in spring and phytoplankton in summer to autumn, yearly averaged carbon occurring mainly in the phytoplankton and phytoplankton accounting for a much greater proportion of carbon than bacteria. There also were differences: the Florida lake had lower absolute and relative carbon biomass in crustacean zooplankton, stronger dominance of protozoa in total grazer carbon biomass, a lower ratio of zooplankton to phytoplankton carbon and almost a monoculture of predation-resistant copepods (versus a relatively balanced distribution of carbon among cladocerans, copepods and rotifers in the temperate lakes). The subtropical lake also had 4-fold higher relative biomass of small filamentous cyanobacteria in its phytoplankton, which we attribute to light limitation. Although the Florida and German studies did not measure biomass of planktivorous fish, the differences observed here are consistent with a recent hypothesis that fish predation exerts stronger top–down control on the pelagic food web in subtropical lakes than in temperate lakes of similar trophic status.

Communicating editor: K.J. Flynn


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.