Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on October 9, 2006
Journal of Plankton Research 2007 29(1):47-56; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbl056
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/1/47    most recent
fbl056v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Tezanos Pinto, P.
Right arrow Articles by O’Farrell, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by de Tezanos Pinto, P.
Right arrow Articles by O’Farrell, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Influence of free-floating plants on the structure of a natural phytoplankton assemblage: an experimental approach

Paula de Tezanos Pinto, Luz Allende and Inés O’Farrell*

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (Conicet) and Lab. Limnología, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, C1428 EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

* Corresponding Author: ines{at}ege.fcen.uba.ar

Received on April 6, 2006; accepted on October 3, 2006


   Abstract

The influence of free-floating plants on the structure of natural phytoplankton was assessed using field mesocosms. Poor underwater light climate (natural macrophyte cover and dark mesh treatments) determined the dominance of shade-adapted, slow-growing filamentous and colonial cyanobacteria [S and Lo functional groups; Reynolds, C. S., Huszar, V., Kruk, C. et al. (2002) Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. J. Plankton Res., 24, 417–428]. Biovolume and chlorophyll a (Chl a) remained low, anoxic conditions prevailed, pH was circumneutral and nutrient levels did not differ significantly. Conversely, the improvement in light availability by removal of floating plants brought about major changes on the phytoplankton and in the physicochemical environment: the S–Lo assemblage was replaced by fast-growing unicellular green algae (X1 and X2) and eukaryotic picophytoplankton (X3) increased, anoxia was reverted and ammonium and phosphate concentrations decreased significantly. We propose that in warm nutrient-rich wetlands, the shading effect posed by floating plants is the driving force in shaping the phytoplankton and in determining a newly described alternative state. Notwithstanding, if the shading constraint is released, a strong phytoplankton enhancement occurs and nitrogen becomes limiting. This experimental approach confirms the behaviour of dominant functional groups as described in nature and thus reinforces the validity and deepens the comprehension of this novel scheme for phytoplankton control.


Communicating editor: K.J. Flynn


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.