Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on June 20, 2006
Journal of Plankton Research 2006 28(9):847-855; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbl020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/9/847    most recent
fbl020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, B. P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hosie, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, B. P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hosie, G. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Continuous Plankton Recorder flow rates revisited: clogging, ship speed and flow meter design

Brian P. V. Hunt1,* and Graham W. Hosie

1 Department of Earth and Ocean Science, University of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 124 and 2 Australian Antarctic Division, Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia

* Corresponding Author: bhunt{at}eos.ubc.ca

Received March 3, 2006; accepted in principle May 5, 2006; accepted for publication June 15, 2006; published online June 20, 2006
Communicating editor: R.P. Harris

The factors affecting the volume of water filtered by a Type II Mark III Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR) were investigated in eastern Antarctica in February/March 2003. Three tows were conducted, one each using 270-, 224- and 125-µm nylon mesh. Volume filtered was measured at ~3-s intervals with a Valeport electromagnetic flow meter, while ship speed, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and fluorescence were measured every minute. Substantial variation in measured volume filtered (MVF) was recorded on each transect. Ship speed was positively correlated with MVF and caused up to 30% reductions in MVF while clogging, predominantly by phytoplankton, resulted in up to 60% reductions in MVF. A maximum 78% reduction in MVF resulted from the combined effects of clogging and ship speed. The substantial impact of clogging on observed zooplankton densities highlights the need for flow meter measurements to quantify CPR data. However, observations from this study show that the CPR flow meter currently in use may itself have caused the positive correlation between MVF and ship speed, indicating the need for improved flow meter design. Continuing miniaturization and improved resolution of distance loggers for attachment to marine vertebrate predators holds promise in this area.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.