JPR Advance Access originally published online on February 9, 2006
Journal of Plankton Research 2006 28(5):509-522; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi136
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Laboratory studies of predatorprey encounters in turbulent environments: effects of changes in orientation and field of view
1 Risø National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark, 2 Centre for Advanced Study, Drammensveien 78, N-0271 Oslo, Norway, 3 Institute of Physics, University of Oslo, Box 1048 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway and 4 Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, Box 1029 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
* Corresponding Author: hans.pecseli{at}fys.uio.no
Received October 18, 2005; accepted in principle December 14, 2005; accepted for publication February 6, 2006; published online February 9, 2006
Communicating editor: K.J. Flynn
Small polystyrene particles were used to represent aquatic micro-organisms on millimeter scales, assuming small or negligible self-induced motions. A large number of such particles were released in turbulent flows that were generated in a controlled laboratory experiment, where the turbulence parameters were reproducible and could be kept constant over extended times. These polystyrene particles are tracked by video techniques. The available database allows estimates of the equivalents of planktonic contact rates in the turbulent flow. The results are expressed in terms of average prey fluxes. Scaling laws for the average contact rates for different turbulence intensities and for varying ranges of interception of the predators and also for different forms of the fields of view were analyzed, using two models for the orientation with respect to the flow. Irrespective of orientation and shape of the volume of interception, the scaling with the turbulence intensity is weak, while the variations with the range of perception are significant. The scaling laws obtained by this procedure have universal validity, and they are applicable also for conditions in nature. The sole restriction is that the range of predator perception is within the universal subrange.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. W. Visser, P. Mariani, and S. Pigolotti Swimming in turbulence: zooplankton fitness in terms of foraging efficiency and predation risk J. Plankton Res., February 1, 2009; 31(2): 121 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
