Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on January 9, 2006
Journal of Plankton Research 2006 28(5):449-457; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi120
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/5/449    most recent
fbi120v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reul, A.
Right arrow Articles by Burkill, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reul, A.
Right arrow Articles by Burkill, P. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Control of microplankton size structure in contrasting water columns of the Celtic Sea

Andreas Reul1,*, J. Rodríguez1, J. M. Blanco1, A. Rees2 and P. H. Burkill3

1 Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga 29071, Spain, 2 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, Plymouth PL1 3DH, UK and 3 National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK

* Corresponding Author: areul{at}uma.es

Received August 3, 2005; accepted in principle October 12, 2005; accepted for publication January 3, 2006; published online January 9, 2006
Communicating editor: R.P. Harris

Water column structure, microphytoplankton size spectra and nutrient concentration were analysed at six sampling stations in the Celtic Sea. Three types of stations were distinguished: (i) where the upper mixed layer (UML) reaches the total depth (TD), (ii) where the UML is about half of TD and (iii) where the UML is considerably less than half the TD. The UML was nutrient rich at type A stations and was nutrient depleted at type B stations. At type C stations, the UML was nitrate depleted and silicate rich. Two groups of microplankton size-abundance spectra (SAS) were found: (i) a typical linear SAS and (ii) a more complex ‘atypical’ SAS, with a linear part up to 160 µm and a dome at 300 µm caused by a Coscinodiscus wailesii bloom. The dome was observed at all depths at type A stations and above the pycnocline and at the seafloor of type B stations. Combining intrinsic growth rate, sinking rate and mixing layer depth, the C. wailesii dome persists only at type A stations but settles out of the UML at the remaining stations. This suggests that a large part of the perturbation at the right extreme of phytoplankton SAS does not propagate along the planktonic SAS but sinks to the seafloor.

This paper was presented in a session on "Size Structure of Plankton Communities", at the ASLO Summer International Meeting, held in Santiago de Compostela, Spain, between 19 and 24 June, and coordinated by Xabier Irigoien, Roger Harris and Angel Lopez-Urrutia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
M. Huete-Ortega, E. Maranon, M. Varela, and A. Bode
General patterns in the size scaling of phytoplankton abundance in coastal waters during a 10-year time series
J. Plankton Res., October 28, 2009; (2009) fbp104v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.