Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on December 8, 2005
Journal of Plankton Research 2006 28(2):195-207; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi112
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/2/195    most recent
fbi112v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouvy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Troussellier, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bouvy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Troussellier, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Functional structure of microbial food web in the Senegal River Estuary (West Africa): impact of metazooplankton

Marc Bouvy1,2,*, Marc Pagano1, Maimouna M’Boup1, Patrice Got2 and Marc Troussellier2

1 Centre IRD Bel Air, UR 167 Cyroco, BP 1386, Dakar, Senegal and 2 Laboratoire Ecosystèmes Lagunaires, UMR-CNRS 5119, Université Montpellier II, Case 093, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France

* Corresponding Author: bouvy{at}mpl.ird.fr

Received October 24, 2005; accepted in principle November 16, 2005; accepted for publication December 7, 2005; published online December 8, 2005
Communicating editor: I. R. Jenkinson

We studied the impact of various metazooplanktonic predators (two calanoid copepods and barnacle larvae) on microbial plankton isolated from the Senegal River Estuary. Experiments performed in microcosms were based on size-class fractionation (3, 12, 20 and 60 µm size classes) of the microbial community in order to obtain different assemblages, including bacteria, heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF), ciliates, pico- and nanophytoplankton. Removal of bacterial predators >3 µm increased the net growth rate of heterotrophic bacteria from 0.437 day–1 in the presence of all predators (fraction <60 µm) to 0.682 day–1 (fraction <3 µm). Removal of protozoa >12 µm caused an increased net growth rate of flagellates from 0.102 day–1 (fraction <60 µm) to 0.332 day–1 (fraction <12 µm). The same results were also observed on protozoa dynamics in the presence of Temora stylifera (0.498 day–1), suggesting a trophic control of the protozoa >12 µm by this copepod, allowing an increase in HNF growth rates through indirect effect. The highest ingestion rate over 60 h of experiment was recorded for the copepod Temora (61.1 µm3 ngC–1 h–1) and the lowest value for barnacle larvae (25.6 µm3 ngC–1 h–1). An intermediate value (47.5 µm3 ngC–1 h–1) was recorded for the copepod Acartia clausi. All these ingestion rates were mainly channeled in the size classes between <3 and 15–18 µm equivalent spherical diameter (ESD) (6 and 2435 µm3, respectively), with the highest values noted between <3 and 6–9 µm classes. In the presence of Temora, the cascading effects can explain both the decreases in mean volume and in growth rate for bacteria, due to the filtration of ciliates by the zooplanktonic predator, allowing the development of the HNF. The presence of a large size class of bacteria (among the five classes identified by flow cytometry) and a high abundance of HNF suggest an efficient heterotrophic pathway within the microbial loop of this sub-saharan estuary.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.