Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on June 13, 2005
Journal of Plankton Research 2005 27(6):569-585; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi033
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/6/569    most recent
fbi033v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Branstrator, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Branstrator, D. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Contrasting life histories of the predatory cladocerans Leptodora kindtii and Bythotrephes longimanus

Donn K. Branstrator*

Department of Biology, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN 55812, USA

* Corresponding Author: dbranstr{at}d.umn.edu

Received January 12, 2005; accepted in principle April 4, 2005; accepted for publication May 23, 2005; published online June 13, 2005
Communicating editor: K.J. Flynn

The predatory cladocerans, Leptodora kindtii (Focke, 1844) and Bythotrephes longimanus (Leydig, 1860), express markedly different life-history traits. Leptodora produce small-bodied neonates that mature at small sizes but continue to grow throughout life. Bythotrephes produce larger neonates in both relative and absolute terms that grow rapidly to a large size at maturity whereupon they curtail somatic growth and divert resources mainly to reproduction. Despite their remarkable differences, the sets of life-history traits of both species appear to be solutions to the same basic selection pressures imposed by visually discriminating gape-limited fishes and foraging constraints imposed by prey size. Leptodora stresses pre-contact (transparency) while Bythotrephes stresses postcontact (caudal spine) modes of morphological defense against fishes. Mounting these disparate modes of defense has consequences for selection on timing and allocation to body growth that may underlie competitive imbalance between the species. Owing to the production of large-bodied neonates that grow rapidly, Bythotrephes quickly attain body sizes that both admit them to a broader prey base in size and taxonomic variety, and allow shorter prey handling times, in comparison to Leptodora. This provides Bythotrephes with a wider and more exploitable prey base from an earlier age and may explain why Leptodora has declined in density following Bythotrephes invasion into some North American lakes. The divergent sets of life-history traits expressed by Leptodora and Bythotrephes parallel two dominant life-history strategies evolved by phytoplanktivorous species of the order Cladocera.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
C. J. Tanner and D. K. Branstrator
Generational and dual-species exposures to invertebrate predators influence relative head size in Daphnia mendotae
J. Plankton Res., August 1, 2006; 28(8): 793 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.