Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on April 19, 2005
Journal of Plankton Research 2005 27(5):427-447; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/5/427    most recent
fbi016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hinckley, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hinckley, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Non-linear dynamics of a pelagic ecosystem model with multiple predator and prey types

Georgina A. Gibson1,*, David L. Musgrave2 and Sarah Hinckley3

1 School of Fisheries and Ocean Science, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775–7220, USA, 2 Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220, USA and 3 NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way Northeast, Seattle, WA 98115, USA

* Corresponding Author: george{at}ims.uaf.edu

Received October 11, 2004; accepted in principle January 26, 2005; accepted for publication March 29, 2005; published online April 19, 2005

Using numerical techniques, we explored the dynamics of a one-dimensional, six-component nutrient–phytoplankton–zooplankton (NPZ) model in which zooplankton grazed on a mixed prey field. Five alternative functional forms were implemented to describe zooplankton grazing, and the form for predation on mesozooplankton was prescribed by a product of a specific predation rate (h) and the mesozooplankton concentration raised to a power (q), which we varied between one and two. With all five grazing functions, Hopf bifurcations, where the form of the solution transitioned between steady equilibrium and periodic limit cycles, persisted across the qh parameter space. Regardless of the values of h and q, with some forms of the grazing function, we were unable to find steady equilibrium solutions that simultaneously comprised non-zero concentrations for all six model components. Extensions of Michaelis–Menten-based single resource grazing formulations to multiple resources resulted in periodic solutions for a large portion of the qh space. Conversely, extensions of the sigmoidal grazing formulation to multiple resources resulted in steady solutions for a large portion of qh parameter space. Our results demonstrate the consequences of the functional form of biological processes on the form of the model solutions. Both the steady or oscillatory nature of state variable concentrations and the likelihood of their elimination are important considerations for ecosystem-modelling studies, particularly when attempting to model an ecosystem in which multiple phytoplankton and zooplankton components are thought to persist simultaneously for at least a portion of the seasonal cycle.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.