Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on November 22, 2004
Journal of Plankton Research 2005 27(2):189-197; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbh159
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/2/189    most recent
fbh159v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pérez, V.
Right arrow Articles by García-Soto, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pérez, V.
Right arrow Articles by García-Soto, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol. 27 No. 2 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Seasonal and interannual variability of chlorophyll a and primary production in the Equatorial Atlantic: in situ and remote sensing observations

Valesca Pérez1,*, Emilio Fernández1, Emilio Marañón1, Pablo Serret1 and Carlos García-Soto2

1 Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad de Vigo, E-36310 Vigo, Spain and 2 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Santander, APDO 240, E-39080 Santander, Spain

* Corresponding Author: vperez{at}uvigo.es

Received July 19, 2004; accepted in principle September 17, 2004; accepted for publication October 28, 2004; published online November 22, 2004

The seasonal variability of phytoplankton in the Equatorial Atlantic was analysed using Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS)-derived chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentration data from 1998 to 2001, together with in situ Chl a and primary production data obtained during seven cruises carried out between 1995 and 2000. Monthly averaged SeaWiFS Chl a distributions were in agreement with previous observations in the Equatorial Atlantic, showing marked differences between 10° W in the Eastern Tropical Atlantic (ETRA) and 25° W in the Western Tropical Atlantic (WTRA) provinces (Longhurst et al. 1995. J. Plankton Res., 17, 1245–1271). The seasonal cycle of SeaWiFS-derived Chl a concentration calculated for 0–10° S, 0–20° W (ETRA) is consistent with in situ Chl a measurements, with values ranging from 0.16 mg m–3, from February to April, to 0.52 mg m–3 in August. Lower variability was observed in 10° N–10° S, 20–30° W (WTRA) where minimum and maximum concentrations occurred in April (0.15 mg m–3) and in August (0.24 mg m–3), respectively. A significant empirical relationship between depth-integrated primary production and in situ measured sea surface Chl a was found for ETRA, allowing us to estimate the seasonal cycle of depth-integrated primary production from SeaWiFS-derived Chl a. As for Chl a, this model was verified in a small area of the Eastern Equatorial Atlantic (0–10° S, 0–20° W), although in this instance it was not completely able to describe the magnitude and temporal variability of in situ primary production measurements. The annual euphotic depth-integrated primary production rate estimated for ETRA by our empirical model was 1.4 Gt C year–1, which represents 16% of the open ocean primary production estimated for the whole Atlantic Ocean.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
Y. Z. Yacobi
Temporal and vertical variation of chlorophyll a concentration, phytoplankton photosynthetic activity and light attenuation in Lake Kinneret: possibilities and limitations for simulation by remote sensing
J. Plankton Res., August 1, 2006; 28(8): 725 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.