Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on October 5, 2005
Journal of Plankton Research 2005 27(11):1113-1125; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi078
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/11/1113    most recent
fbi078v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baier, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Terazaki, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baier, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Terazaki, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2005.

Interannual variability in a predator–prey interaction: climate, chaetognaths and copepods in the southeastern Bering Sea

C. T. Baier1,* and M. Terazaki2

1 NOAA/NMFS/AFSC, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE. Bin C 15700, Seattle, WA 98115-0070, USA and 2 Ocean Research Institute, the University of Tokyo, 1-15-1 Minamidai, Nakano-Ku, Tokyo 164-8639, Japan

* Corresponding Author: Christine.Baier{at}noaa.gov

Received June 6, 2005; accepted in principle August 25, 2005; accepted for publication September 28, 2005; published online October 5, 2005
Communicating editor: R.P. Harris

The interaction of the chaetognath Sagitta elegans with the copepod community of the southeast Bering Sea middle shelf was examined in relation to environmental conditions during 1995–1999. Predation impact was estimated for 2 years, 1995 and 1997, using gut content analysis, experimentally derived digestion time (DT) and abundances of chaetognaths and prey. Pseudocalanus concentrations correlated with water temperature and Calanus marshallae with sea ice extent. Sagitta elegans were less abundant but individuals were larger in 1995, when C. marshallae predominated, compared to 1997, when Pseudocalanus and Acartia were the primary prey. Predation by S. elegans removed <1% standing stock day–1 of Pseudocalanus or C. marshallae in 1995 and 1.7 to 2.3% of Pseudocalanus in 1997. The percent of the copepod community biomass required by chaetognaths was estimated to be <1% in 1995 compared with 8–12% in 1997. Calanus marshallae may be more vulnerable than Pseudocalanus to cumulative predation effects because of its reproductive strategy. The effect of chaetognath predation on the copepod community depends on which copepod species is predominant and its susceptibility to cumulative predation effects, as well as on daily predation impact, both of which varied between years with different climatic conditions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.